William R. Uttal: Mind and Brain: A Critical Appraisal of Cognitive Neuroscience

@article{Gobet2014WilliamRU,
  title={William R. Uttal: Mind and Brain: A Critical Appraisal of Cognitive Neuroscience},
  author={Fernand R. Gobet},
  journal={Minds and Machines},
  year={2014},
  volume={24},
  pages={221-226},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:17983334}
}
In this book, William Uttal provides a critical review of cognitive neuroscience, focusing on a specific question: What do the brain-imaging techniques developed in the last two decades or so—mostly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET)—tell us about the head-mind problem?

Allen Newell's Program of Research: The Video-Game Test

It is concluded that, while they use sophisticated methods of analysis and discuss interesting results, overall these papers contribute only little to Newell's program of research, and reflect the current state of psychology and cognitive science.

Chunks, Schemata, and Retrieval Structures: Past and Current Computational Models

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) and the use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and the original publication in this journal is cited.

Investigating the Roles of Neuroscience and Knowledge Management in Higher Education

This chapter explains the current trends in higher education, the overview of neuroscience, the multifaceted applications of neuroscience, the overview of knowledge management (KM), the perspectives

ERP to chess stimuli reveal expert-novice differences in the amplitudes of N2 and P3 components.

Results were consistent with the view that prolonged N2 components reflect matching of current perceptual input to memory, and thus are sensitive to experts' superior pattern recognition and memory retrieval of chunks.

Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

It is shown that the average statistical power of studies in the neurosciences is very low, and the consequences include overestimates of effect size and low reproducibility of results.

Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance

A review of neuroscience articles in five top-ranking journals found that 78 used the correct procedure and 79 used the incorrect procedure, and suggests that incorrect analyses of interactions are even more common in cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Mind and Brain: A Critical Appraisal of Cognitive Neuroscience

In Mind and Brain, William Uttal offers a critical review of cognitive neuroscience, examining both its history and modern developments in the field, paying particular attention to the role of brain imaging in studying the mind-brain relationship.

How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging?

This paper examines the many factors that influence the quality of acquired fMRI data and conducts a review of the existing literature to determine if some measure of agreement has emerged regarding the reliability of fMRI.

Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 1

It is argued that, in some cases, other analysis problems likely created entirely spurious correlations and the data from these studies could be reanalyzed with unbiased methods to provide accurate estimates of the correlations in question and urge authors to perform such reanalyses.

Automatic Generation of Cognitive Theories using Genetic Programming

A new approach to theory development in neuroscience is presented: the automatic generation and testing of cognitive theories using genetic programming (GP), which evolves from experimental data cognitive theories that explain “the mental program” that subjects use to solve a specific task.

BRAIN LOCALIZATION OF MEMORY CHUNKS IN CHESSPLAYERS

This study tested some predictions of chunk-based theories of expertise by using fMRI while chessplayers performed a recognition memory task and predicted that the recognition memory tasks would activate working memory areas in the frontal and parietal lobes.