Proof assistant

Known as: Interactive proof assistant, Proof script, Proof editor 
In computer science and mathematical logic, a proof assistant or interactive theorem prover is a software tool to assist with the development of… (More)
Wikipedia

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2017
2017
Theoreticians often use sophisticated notation to communicate and reason about key ideas in their theories and models. Notation… (More)
  • figure 2
  • figure 6
Is this relevant?
2015
2015
This paper describes an embedding of higher-order modal logics in the Coq proof assistant. Coq’s capabilities are used to… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
This paper describes Hipster, a system integrating theory exploration with the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL. Theory exploration… (More)
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
2011
2011
Proof assistants in the LCF tradition, such as Coq, Isabelle, and the HOL family, are notorious for old-fashioned command-line… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2009
2009
Logical framework research is based on the philosophical point of view that it should be possible to capture mathematical… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2007
Highly Cited
2007
Matita is a new, document-centric, tactic-based interactive theorem prover. This paper focuses on some of the distinctive… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2006
Highly Cited
2006
This paper reports on the development and formal certification (proof of semantic preservation) of a compiler from Cminor (a C… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
We show how the proof-assistant Coq helped us formally verify security properties of an API. As far as we know, this is the rst… (More)
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
Proof assistants are complex applications whose development has never been properly systematized or documented. This work is a… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2002