Love or fear: Can punishment promote cooperation?

@article{Kroupa2014LoveOF,
  title={Love or fear: Can punishment promote cooperation?},
  author={Sebestian Kroupa},
  journal={Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues},
  year={2014},
  volume={23},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:205826673}
}
  • Sebestian Kroupa
  • Published in 12 November 2014
  • Philosophy
  • Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues
It is argued that current evidence supports punishment as an efficient means for the maintenance of cooperation, and that the gravity of proposed limitations of punishment for maintaining cooperation may have been overestimated in previous studies due to the features of experimental design.

Third-Party Punishment or Compensation? It Depends on the Reputational Benefits

This study systematically reveals aReputational interaction between fourth and third parties, and verifies the affection of reputational benefits on the third parties' preference between punishment and compensation.

Toward Consilience on Indirect Reciprocity: Strategic Communication Theory and Findings from Social Psychology, Sociology, and Anthropology

ABSTRACT This article pursues interdisciplinary synthesis and consilience regarding the concept of indirect reciprocity and its relevance to strategic communication theory. Identified and named by

Cooperation and Punishment, Especially in Humans

A direct (neighbor‐modulated) fitness approach is used to analyze when punishment is favored and reveals that relatedness between interacting individuals is not crucial to explaining cooperation through punishment, and increasing relatedness directly disfavors punishing behavior.

The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation

    M. EgasA. Riedl
    Economics
  • 2008
The results indicate that punishment is strongly governed by its cost-to-impact ratio and that its effect on cooperation can be pinned down to one single variable: the threshold level of free-riding that goes unpunished.

The evolution of punishment through reputation

It is shown analytically that punishment can lead to long-term benefits if it influences one's reputation and thereby makes the punisher more likely to receive help in future interactions and that experiments investigating the beneficial effects of punishment in humans should include reputation as an explicit feature.

Altruistic punishment in humans

It is shown experimentally that the altruistic punishment of defectors is a key motive for the explanation of cooperation, and that future study of the evolution of human cooperation should include a strong focus on explaining altruistic punished.

Indirect Punishment and Generosity Toward Strangers

Cheaper Cooperation In the context of public goods games in which optimal benefit is achieved when all participants contribute, bad behavior cannot always be deterred by direct punishment, and has

Anti-social Punishment Can Prevent the Co-evolution of Punishment and Cooperation

It is found that evolution can favor anti-social punishment, and that when anti- social punishment is possible costly punishment no longer promotes cooperation.

More ‘altruistic’ punishment in larger societies

The hypothesis that population size (and complexity) predicts the level of third-party punishment is tested and shows that people in larger, more complex societies engage in significantly more third- party punishment than people in small-scale societies.

Winners don’t punish

It is shown that the option of costly punishment increases the amount of cooperation but not the average payoff of the group, which suggests that costly punishment behaviour is maladaptive in cooperation games and might have evolved for other reasons.

The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment

Advances in experimental economics and evolutionary biology are combined to show that costly punishment and reputation formation, respectively, induce cooperation in social dilemmas and that punishment is maintained when a combination with reputation building is available, however, at a low level.

Self‐serving punishment and the evolution of cooperation

It is believed that the classification of mechanisms given by Lehmann and Keller underestimates the role of punishment as a driving force in the origin of cooperation, rather than just a modifier of the costs and benefits of defection.
...