Aspidoscelis stictogramma

Known as: Aspidoscelis burti stictogramma, Cnemidophorus burti stictogrammus, Cnemidophorus sackii stictogrammus 
 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

1989-2016
01219892016

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2017
Review
2017
Zygocercous (aggregating) cercarial larvae were recently discovered emerging from a physid snail during a molecular survey of… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 3
  • table 4
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?
2016
2012
2012
Many species of pocket gophers and their ectoparasitic chewing lice have broadly congruent phylogenies, indicating a history of… (More)
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
  • fLint Quarries, nationaL MonuMent, Michael Patrikeev
  • 2008
Herpetofauna of Lake Meredith National Recreation Area and Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument (Texas, USA) is not well… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
An examination of specimens of Anas georgica Gmelin (Anatidae) from Región del Bio-Bio and Región del Maule, Chile, revealed the… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
A total of eight species of furcocercous cercariae of four families (Strigeidae, Diplostomidae, Schistosomatidae and… (More)
  • table I
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
In 1899Reichenow described a new bushshrike species from East Cameroons which he namedLaniarius dubiosus. This bird was in… (More)
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Materials and Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Taxonomic Treatment and Pattern Class Designations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Study Sites at Conchas Lake and Fort Sumner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Field Studies at Conchas Lake and Fort Sumner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Sampling Methods at Conchas Lake and Fort Sumner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Internal Examination of Hybrids and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Estimation of the Year of Hatching of Hybrids and Their Maternal Progenitor . . . . . . 10 Analyses of Color Patterns in Hybrids and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Analyses of Scutellation in Hybrids and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Analyses of Karyotypes in Hybrids and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Analyses of Allozymes in Hybrids and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 (gmannin@uark.edu). 2 Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History (cole@amnh.org). 3 Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, LA 70112. 4 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 (jmwalker@uark.edu). 2 NO. 3492 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Aspidoscelis at Site CL-1* (South of Clabberhill Ranch) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Aspidoscelis at Site CL-13 (Cove Campground) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Aspidoscelis at Site CL-4 (North of Canadian River) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Aspidoscelis at Site CL-5* (East of Conchas Lake Levee) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Aspidoscelis at Site CL-2* (South Recreation Area) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Aspidoscelis at Two Fort Sumner Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Habitat Structure as an Extrinsic Facilitator of Hybridization Between A. neomexicana and A. sexlineata viridis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Perennial Production of A. neomexicana 3 A. sexlineata viridis Hybrids at Conchas Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Sex Ratio of Hybrids Based on Internal Organs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Color Pattern in Male Hybrids and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Color Pattern in Female Hybrids and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Univariate Analyses of Scutellation in Hybrids and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Multivariate Analyses of Scutellation in Hybrids and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Karyotypes of a Hybrid and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Allozymes of a Hybrid and Parental Species . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Summary and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 2005 3 MANNING ET AL.: HYBRIDIZATION IN LIZARDS 
  • table 2
  • figure 3
  • table 3
  • table 4
  • table 5
Is this relevant?
1989
1989
Mitochondrial DNAs (mtDNAs) of two unisexual, parthenogenetically reproducing species of whiptail lizards (Cnemidophorus velox… (More)
  • figure I
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • table 3
Is this relevant?