Delay of reinforcement gradients in children’s learning

@article{Walters1964DelayOR,
  title={Delay of reinforcement gradients in children’s learning},
  author={Richard H. Walters},
  journal={Psychonomic Science},
  year={1964},
  volume={1},
  pages={307-308},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:146998313}
}
Ninety Grade 2 children were randomly assigned to one of nine conditions in a study of the effects of concurrent delay of reward and delay of punishment on children’s learning. Three levels of delay of reward and three levels of delay of punishment, 0, 10, and 30 sec. in each case, were selected for study. Both increasing delay of reward and increasing delay of punishment significantly increased the number of errors made during learning. 

Children’s discrimination learning as related to delayed punishment

The performances of 80 third-grade children on either an easy or a difficult discrimination task were compared under two delay of punishment conditions, 0 or 20 sec. Punishment consisted of a 3-sec

Stimulus duration effects on secondary reinforcement

Delay of primary reinforcement in training and stimulus duration in extinction were manipulated with kindergarten children as Ss on a push-button task. Each S was exposed to two different potential

Effectiveness of Punishment as an Interaction of Intensity, Timing, Agent Nurturance, and Cognitive Structuring.

In order to assess the effects of variations in four punishment parameters on resistance to deviation in children, 80 grade 1 and grade 2 boys were randomly assigned to 1 of 16 conditions in a 2 x 2

The Learning Theory Model of Punishment

Both the experimental laboratory model of punishment and the juvenile justice system's negative sanctioning process have a common goal of suppressing undesired behavior. The psychological literature

Frequent probabilistic punishment in law enforcement

Abstract. Timing and frequency of punishment are critical elements in law enforcement. Previous studies suggest the superiority of immediate punishment schemes over delayed punishment, as well as the

Experience with Punishment and Specific Deterrence: Evidence from Speeding Tickets

Using unique data that cover anonymized individual driving and ticketing histories of more than 170,000 car owners over 15 months, a strong and persistent specific deterrence effect from receiving a ticket is evaluated.

THE PAT ON THE BACK PARADOX AND HUMAN ADJUSTMENT TO ECONOMIC INCENTIVES

  • 2001

EFFECTS OF CONCURRENT DELAYS OF MATERIAL REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS ON PROBLEM-SOLVING IN CHILDREN.

A study of the effects of concurrent delay of reward and delay of punishment on children's problem solving found three levels of delay of Reward, which reflects the importance of knowing when to accept a reward and when to reject it.

THE VARIED EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT ON BEHAVIOR.

A systematic examination of the data led to the conclusions that if an aversive stimulus is contingent upon a response there will be greater suppression (or less facilitation) of the response than if the aversive stimuli is not contingent upon the response, but that the aversion may result in response facilitation under some conditions and response suppression in others.