Skip to search form
Skip to main content
Skip to account menu
Semantic Scholar
Semantic Scholar's Logo
Search 225,166,818 papers from all fields of science
Search
Sign In
Create Free Account
Scantegrity
Known as:
Scantegrity II
Scantegrity is a security enhancement for optical scan voting systems, providing such systems with end-to-end (E2E) verifiability of election results…
Expand
Wikipedia
(opens in a new tab)
Create Alert
Alert
Related topics
Related topics
6 relations
Bingo voting
Commitment scheme
Communications of the ACM
Invisible ink
Expand
Papers overview
Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2017
2017
The Scantegrity Voting System and its Use in the Takoma Park Elections
D. Chaum
,
R. Carback
,
+9 authors
Filip Zagórski
2017
Corpus ID: 53989878
The Scantegrity project began with a simple question: is it possible to design a voting system offering the strong security…
Expand
2016
2016
Security Analysis of Scantegrity, an Electronic Voting System
J. Ganz
,
M. Bishop
,
S. Peisert
2016
Corpus ID: 20249856
Electronic voting machines are becoming an increasingly popular alternative to paper ballots. With this increase in use we must…
Expand
2015
2015
Performance Evaluation of the Bingo Electronic Voting Protocol
Waleed A. Naji
,
S. Khattab
,
F. Omara
2015
Corpus ID: 34698910
Research in e-voting aims at designing usable and secure electronic voting systems. This paper provides an empirical analysis of…
Expand
2014
2014
Formal Verification of Advanced Families of Security Protocols: E-Voting and APIs. (Vérification formelle de familles avancées de protocoles de sécurité : vote électronique et API)
Cyrille Wiedling
2014
Corpus ID: 37820133
For a long time now, formal methods have been successfully used to analyze security protocols. Several tools have even been…
Expand
2014
2014
System Usability and User Mental Models of Three Verifiable, End-to-end Voting Methods: Helios, Prêt à Voter, and Scantegrity II
C. Acemyan
2014
Corpus ID: 110371637
System Usability and User Mental Models of Three Verifiable, End-to-end Voting Methods: Helios, Prêt à Voter, and Scantegrity II
2012
2012
Electronic voting with Scantegrity: analysis and exposing a vulnerability
John S. Dean
Electron. Gov. an Int. J.
2012
Corpus ID: 16114452
This paper describes Scantegrity, an electronic voting system developed by Chaum et al. (2008b), and it analyses Scantegrity's…
Expand
2011
2011
Scantegrity III: Automatic Trustworthy Receipts, Highlighting Over/Under Votes, and Full Voter Verifiability
A. Sherman
,
R. A. Fink
,
R. Carback
,
D. Chaum
Conference on Electronic voting technology…
2011
Corpus ID: 1238667
Building on lessons learned from the November 2009 Scantegrity II election in Takoma Park, MD, we propose improvements to the…
Expand
2011
2011
Readiness of various eVoting systems for complex elections
Denise Demirel
,
R. Frankland
,
M. Volkamer
2011
Corpus ID: 17606195
Electronic voting, or eVoting, systems in polling stations are becoming more and more widely implemented. However, they face…
Expand
2010
2010
Scantegrity Mock Election at Takoma Park
A. Sherman
,
R. Carback
,
+9 authors
P. Vora
Electronic Voting
2010
Corpus ID: 5571900
We report on our experiences and lessons learned using Scantegrity II in a mock election held April 11, 2009, in Takoma Park…
Expand
2010
2010
Safe RPC: Auditing mixnets safely using Randomized Partial Checking
Stefan Popoveniuc
,
Eugen Leontie
International Conference on Security and…
2010
Corpus ID: 17166065
Secure voting systems like PunchScan and Scantegrity use mixnets which are verified using Randomized Partial Checking (RPC). This…
Expand
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our
Privacy Policy
(opens in a new tab)
,
Terms of Service
(opens in a new tab)
, and
Dataset License
(opens in a new tab)
ACCEPT & CONTINUE