Cutaneous Phaeohyphomycosis

Known as: Cutaneous Phaeohyphomycoses, Phaeohyphomycoses, Cutaneous, Phaeohyphomycosis, Cutaneous 
 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

1986-2017
02419862017

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2015
2015
Cladophialophora bantiana is a neurotropic dematiaceous fungus which only rarely affects the skin. We report a case of… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?
2015
2015
We describe a case of cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis in a 61-year-old man receiving re-dialysis treatment for renal failure of a… (More)
Is this relevant?
2010
2010
A case of cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Cladosporium cladosporioides in a 50-year-old housewife is described. The… (More)
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
Organ transplant recipients under immunosuppressive therapy have a highly increased risk of acquiring unusual opportunistic… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
A 7-year-old castrated male Whippet developed deep ulcerative skin lesions whilst receiving immunosuppressive doses of… (More)
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
Human infections due to Cladosporium oxysporum are rarely known. This case report describes cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis cause by… (More)
Is this relevant?
1999
1999
The case of a 66-year-old woman with Cushing syndrome and a 1-year history of papulo-nodular lesions on the right leg is reported… (More)
Is this relevant?
1997
1997
Two cases of cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis, one with a nodular appearance and the other with an erythematous infiltrating patch… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
  • figure 6–7
Is this relevant?
1990
1990
A 60-year-old man who had had a renal transplantation developed a nodule on the dorsum of his right middle finger, which was… (More)
Is this relevant?
1990
1990
Two cases of ungual and cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Alternaria alternata and Alternaria chlamydospora are described… (More)
Is this relevant?