Charging argument

In computer science, a charging argument is used to compare the output of an optimization algorithm to an optimal solution. It is typically used to…

Wikipedia

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.

2017

Optimal Recharging With Practical Considerations in Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Network

Xunpeng RaoPanlong YangYubo YanHao ZhouXuangou Wu
IEEE Access
2017
Corpus ID: 7413839

Wireless energy transfer technologies have attracted increasing attention on empowering the wireless sensor nodes in recent years…

2016

Poster: Electric vehicle network bidirectional charging for flexible vehicle-to-grid services

For flexible vehicle-to-grid (V2G) supports with a large scale electric vehicle (EV) network, a novel charging scheme is proposed…

Highly Cited

2015

Highly Cited

2015

Real-time energy management algorithm for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging parks involving sustainable energy

A. Mohamed
IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting
2015
Corpus ID: 108859352

Summary form only given. In this paper, a real-time energy management algorithm (RTEMA) for a grid-connected charging park in an…

2015

A Multiagent Approach to Variable-Rate Electric Vehicle Charging Coordination

Konstantina ValogianniW. KetterJohn Collins
Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
2015
Corpus ID: 12579025

We present a coordination mechanism for variable-rate electric vehicle (EV) charging that combines the benefits of a…

2014

Schedulability decision of charging missions in wireless rechargeable sensor networks

Cheng HuYun Wang
Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on…
2014
Corpus ID: 15190665

Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Networks (WRSNs) have received wide attention in recent years due to their potential to solve the…

2014

Two Novel Case Studies of the Crucial Role of Heterogeneous Catalyst Supports: Core@Shell Nanostructure and Photocatalysis.

Kevin A. Dahlberg
2014
Corpus ID: 94498506

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x Chapter 1: Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Chapter 2: Synthesis of Ni@SiO2 nanotube particles in a water-in-oil microemulsion template 18 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Background of water-in-oil microemulsion template synthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Experimental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Effect of aging time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Effect of N2H4 concentration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Effect of temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Effect of TEOS amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Synthesis without Ni precursor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Synthesis with NH3 addition before N2H4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Metal particle accessibility – H2 chemisorption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38