Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu

Charging argument

In computer science, a charging argument is used to compare the output of an optimization algorithm to an optimal solution. It is typically used to… 
Wikipedia (opens in a new tab)

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2019
2019
The goal of this Master thesis is the implementation of DECASIM: a data-driven, discrete-event simulator for electric car sharing… 
2018
2018
The ongoing energy transition in the Dutch electricity grid may lead to grid capacity problems and mismatches between the… 
2017
2017
The Warehouse Administration System is a constant distribution center database fit for taking care of extensive inventories of an… 
2016
2016
Transportation electrification introduces a spatiotemporal tie between the traditionally independent power and transportation… 
2016
2016
This paper presents a planning model for distribution systems considering various energy supply options such as distributed… 
Review
2016
Review
2016
A vehicle may require electrical recharging. A request may be sent to obtain an identification of loading locations along a route… 
2015
2015
Technical dielectric materials and ceramics are used in many different high technology industrial areas and especially for… 
2015
2015
There is described a method with an electric drive (200) for controlling a charging operation of an electric energy storage… 
2014
2014
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x Chapter 1: Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Chapter 2: Synthesis of Ni@SiO2 nanotube particles in a water-in-oil microemulsion template 18 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Background of water-in-oil microemulsion template synthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Experimental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Effect of aging time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Effect of N2H4 concentration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Effect of temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Effect of TEOS amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Synthesis without Ni precursor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Synthesis with NH3 addition before N2H4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Metal particle accessibility – H2 chemisorption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38