FAQ

Canis rufus

Known as: Red Wolf, Wolf, Red 
 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

2013-2015
0120132015

Related topics

Related topics

1 relation

Broader (1)

Wolves

Related mentions per year

Related mentions per year

1936-2018
19401960198020002020
Canis rufus
Wolves

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2016
Review
2016
A Survey of Diseases in Captive Red Wolves (canis Rufus), 1997-2012.
Conservation efforts to preserve the red wolf (Canis rufus) have been in progress since the 1970s through the U.S. Fish and… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • table 4
  • table 5
Is this relevant?
2016
2016
Investigation of captive red wolf ejaculate characteristics in relation to age and inbreeding.
An evaluation of a large database of red wolf fresh ejaculate characteristics (n = 427 ejaculates from 64 wolves) was undertaken… (More)
Is this relevant?
2016
2016
Mitochondrial DNA Variation in Southeastern Pre-Columbian Canids.
The taxonomic status of the red wolf (Canis rufus) is heavily debated, but could be clarified by examining historic specimens… (More)
  • table 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2015
2015
Use of Cortical Bone Fenestration, Autogenous Free Skin Graft, and Thermography for Wound Treatment and Monitoring in a Red Wolf (canis Rufus Gregoryi).
A 2-yr-old female red wolf (Canis rufus gregoryi) sustained a degloving injury to the left thoracic limb while in a display… (More)
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
Inbreeding and inbreeding depression in endangered red wolves (Canis rufus).
In natural populations, the expression and severity of inbreeding depression can vary widely across taxa. Describing processes… (More)
  • table 1
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • table 2
Is this relevant?
Review
2013
Review
2013
Red Wolf (Canis rufus) Recovery: A Review with Suggestions for Future Research
By the 1970s, government-supported eradication campaigns reduced red wolves to a remnant population of less than 100 individuals… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?