Skip to search form
Skip to main content
Skip to account menu
Semantic Scholar
Semantic Scholar's Logo
Search 218,872,507 papers from all fields of science
Search
Sign In
Create Free Account
Software peer review
Known as:
Peer review (disambiguation)
In software development, peer review is a type of software review in which a work product (document, code, or other) is examined by its author and…
Expand
Wikipedia
(opens in a new tab)
Create Alert
Alert
Related topics
Related topics
14 relations
Capability Maturity Model
Code refactoring
Reliability engineering
Requirements analysis
Expand
Broader (1)
Software review
Papers overview
Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2016
Review
2016
From Peer Review to PCAOB Inspections: Regulating for Audit Quality in the U.S.
Lukas Löhlein
2016
Corpus ID: 55287516
This study reviews the existing literature on the US peer review system and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB…
Expand
Review
2013
Review
2013
Peer Portal: Quality enhancement in thesis writing using self-managed peer review on a mass scale
Naghmeh M. Aghaee
,
H. Hansson
2013
Corpus ID: 60514528
This paper describes a specially developed online peer-review system, the Peer Portal, and the first results of its use for…
Expand
Review
2012
Review
2012
A pesquisa de enfermagem e a qualificação da assistência: algumas reflexões
Cinira Magali Fortuna
,
Silvana Martins Mishima
2012
Corpus ID: 72941453
There has been a significant increase in the number of research groups in Brazil (1) , with a subsequent increase in nursing…
Expand
Review
2008
Review
2008
Uncertainty in Structural Engineering
W. Bulleit
2008
Corpus ID: 31010416
Structural engineering design is replete with uncertainties, some of which are obvious and some of which many engineers may never…
Expand
Review
2006
Review
2006
Blind source separation and independent component analysis
C. Puntonet
,
E. Lang
Neurocomputing
2006
Corpus ID: 22823780
Review
2003
Review
2003
Evaluating the effectiveness of learning interventions: an information systems case study
D. Moody
,
Guttorm Sindre
European Conference on Information Systems
2003
Corpus ID: 18654356
Currently, there is no standard instrument for evaluating learning effectiveness. While final examinations and end-of-semester…
Expand
Review
2001
Review
2001
"Thank you for your critical comments and helpful suggestions": compliance and conflict in authors' replies to referees' comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers
H. Gosden
2001
Corpus ID: 55568010
Peer reviews of research papers submitted to journals are an "occluded" genre (Swales, 1996) - referees are usually anonymous and…
Expand
Review
2000
Review
2000
Virtual knowledge: bistable reality and the solution of ill-defined problems
W. Lawless
,
Teresa Castelao-Lawless
,
J. Ballas
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C
2000
Corpus ID: 31586728
Dynamic behavior is enacted from static observations, but as experience is reconstructed with concepts, mutual exclusivity…
Expand
Review
2000
Review
2000
Learning To Write in Urban Elementary and Middle Schools: An Investigation of Teachers' Written Feedback on Student Compositions.
L. Matsumura
,
R. Valdés
,
G. Patthey-Chavez
2000
Corpus ID: 59329028
In writing instruction, feedback from teachers provides a critical opportunity for students to revise their work and improve as…
Expand
1997
1997
Evaluating the interrater agreement of process capability ratings
P. Fusaro
,
K. Emam
,
Bob Smith
Proceedings Fourth International Software Metrics…
1997
Corpus ID: 1634997
The reliability of process assessments has received some study in the recent past, much of it being conducted within the context…
Expand
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our
Privacy Policy
(opens in a new tab)
,
Terms of Service
(opens in a new tab)
, and
Dataset License
(opens in a new tab)
ACCEPT & CONTINUE