Skip to search formSkip to main content

Type punning

Known as: Pun (disambiguation), Reinterpret cast, Reinterpretation cast 
In computer science, type punning is a common term for any programming technique that subverts or circumvents the type system of a programming… Expand
Wikipedia

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2017
2017
Type confusion, often combined with use-after-free, is the main attack vector to compromise modern C++ software like browsers or… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
How Silently Sheela-Na-Gig Speaks: Memory, Mythos, and the Female Body by Amber C. Snider Advisor: Professor Kyoo Lee How and why… Expand
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
This paper explores the different "identities" projected by the palace and gardens of Versailles, the house and garden of Claude… Expand
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
1. In Satire 5 of Thomas Middleton's Micro-cynicon: Six Snarling Satyres (1599), the poet-persona describes being cozened by a… Expand
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
Trata-se de mostrar em que sentido a concepcao normativa de pessoa em John Rawls pressupoe uma transformacao semântica da… Expand
Is this relevant?
2003
2003
Hempelmann, Christian F. Ph. D., Purdue University, August, 2003. Paronomasic Puns: Target Recoverability towards Automatic… Expand
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
1997
Highly Cited
1997
We have developed a formal model of certain types of riddles, and implemented it in a computer program, JAPE, which generates… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
1996
Highly Cited
1996
This thesis describes a formal model of a subtype of humour, and the implementation of that model in a program that generates… Expand
  • figure 5.2
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
1994
Highly Cited
1994
In this paper, we discuss a model of simple question-answer punning, implemented in a program, JAPE-1, which generates riddles… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 3
  • figure 2
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?