Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu

Review Committees

Known as: Committee, Review, Committees, Review, Review Committee 
Committees established to monitor compliance with standards or policies.
National Institutes of Health

Related topics

Related topics

1 relation
Advisory Committees

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2020
Review
2020
Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of ensartinib in crizotinib-resistant, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial.
Review
2017
Review
2017
The WHO Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) approach: Review of implementation to date
Review
2014
Review
2014
Ethical issues in genomic research on the African continent: experiences and challenges to ethics review committees
This is a report on a workshop titled ‘Ethics for genomic research across five African countries: Guidelines, experiences and… 
Highly Cited
2012
Highly Cited
2012
Locating Neocolonialism, “Tradition,” and Human Rights in Uganda's “Gay Death Penalty”
Abstract: In 2009, the Anti-Homosexuality Bill introduced in Uganda's Parliament reignited homophobic sentiment across Africa… 
Review
2012
Review
2012
The Role of Massive Transfusion Protocols in Obstetrics
Abstract Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. New concepts involving the pathophysiology of… 
Highly Cited
2011
Highly Cited
2011
Effect of weight loss on upper airway size and facial fat in men with obstructive sleep apnoea
Background Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is commonly associated with obesity and can be improved by weight loss. Changes in… 
Review
2009
Review
2009
Sexuality and subjective wellbeing in male patients with congenital heart disease
Objective: To assess physical and psychological concerns related to sexuality, the prevalence of erectile dysfunction and their… 
Review
2006
Review
2006
Description and implementation of a quality control program in an imaging-based clinical trial.
Review
2004
Review
2004
Initial twelve months experience and analysis for 2001-2002 from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons--Victorian database project.
Review
2003
Review
2003
A Review Committee's Guide for Evaluating Qualitative Proposals
Although they complain that qualitative proposals are not reviewed fairly when funding agencies use quantitative criteria… 
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy (opens in a new tab), Terms of Service (opens in a new tab), and Dataset License (opens in a new tab)