Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Review [Publication Type]

Known as: reviewed, reviewing, Review 
An article or book published after examination of published material on a subject. It may be comprehensive to various degrees and the time range of… Expand
National Institutes of Health

Related topics

Related topics

5 relations

Narrower (4)

Review LiteratureReview, AcademicReview, MulticaseReview, Systematic
literature survey

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2019
Review
2019
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of… Expand
  • figure 3.2
  • figure 3.2
  • table 3.5
  • table 3.5
  • table 4.2
Review
2011
Review
2011
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration
Review
2010
Review
2010
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Structured summary 2 Provide a structured summary including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study… Expand
  • table 1
  • figure 1
  • table 2
Review
2009
Review
2009
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta… Expand
Review
2009
Review
2009
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement
Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), an update of the… Expand
  • table 1
  • figure 1
  • table 2
Review
2009
Review
2009
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati and colleagues present an Explanation and Elaboration of the PRISMA Statement, updated guidelines for the… Expand
  • table 1
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • table 2
  • table 3
Review
2003
Review
2003
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Cochrane Reviews have recently started including the quantity I 2 to help readers assess the consistency of the results of… Expand
Review
1996
Review
1996
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
It has been suggested that the quality of clinical trials should be assessed by blinded raters to limit the risk of introducing… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • table 4
  • table 5
Review
1996
Review
1996
Review of Particle Physics.
  • Barnett, Carone, +34 authors Amsler
  • Physical review. D, Particles and fields
  • 1996
    • Corpus ID: 40016674
This biennial Review summarizes much of particle physics. Using data from previous editions., plus 2778 new measurements from 645… Expand
Review
1986
Review
1986
Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
This paper examines eight published reviews each reporting results from several related trials. Each review pools the results… Expand
  • table 2
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, and Dataset License
ACCEPT & CONTINUE