Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Retinoschisis of Fovea

Known as: Familial foveal retinoschisis, Foveal retinoschisis 
 
National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2016
2016
PURPOSE To identify the genetic cause of autosomal recessive familial foveal retinoschisis (FFR). METHODS A female sibship with… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • table 1
Is this relevant?
Review
2015
Review
2015
Macular peeling refers to the surgical technique for the removal of preretinal tissue or the internal limiting membrane (ILM) in… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was performed in two cases of bilateral X linked foveal retinoschisis of… Expand
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
PURPOSE To describe the efficacy of vitreous surgery to treat X-linked retinoschisis. DESIGN Retrospective, comparative… Expand
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
Foveal retinoschisis is rarely found in women. An 11-year-old girl, from non-consanguineous parents, presented with bilateral… Expand
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
PURPOSE To report the optical coherence tomography findings of a 5-year-old boy with familial foveal retinoschisis. DESIGN… Expand
Is this relevant?
2003
2003
Foveal or macular retinoschisis is an uncommon retinal disorder, usually seen in patients affected with generalised retinal… Expand
Is this relevant?
1989
1989
We describe hereditary retinoschisis without foveal retinoschisis in a girl (the product of a consanguineous marriage) and her… Expand
Is this relevant?
1987
1987
We report two female patients, a mother and daughter, with bilateral foveal changes that resembled those of X-linked recessive… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
Review
1981
Review
1981
Two male infants with congenital hereditary retinoschisis are presented. The disease was detected when they were 11 and 20 months… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?