Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1

Known as: RECIST 1.1 
A standardized guideline developed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Working Group in 2000 and revised in 2009, which is… (More)
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

2009-2017
0204020092017

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2018
2018
INTRODUCTION Malignant pleural mesothelioma poses unique difficulties in tumor measurement and response assessment; however… (More)
Is this relevant?
2016
2016
The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) were developed and published in 2000, based on the original World… (More)
Is this relevant?
2015
2015
Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) and RECIST are used to assess the effect of treatment with… (More)
  • figure 1
  • table 2
  • table 1
  • table 3
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
INTRODUCTION Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), may underestimate activity and does not… (More)
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
PURPOSE We sought to test and validate the predictive utility of trichotomous tumor response (TriTR; complete response [CR] or… (More)
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
OBJECTIVE To compare the diagnostic performance in evaluating the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), between the… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
OBJECTIVE Our retrospective study compared Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 with modified CT… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2011
Highly Cited
2011
The Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) has previously reached consensus regarding the criteria that should be used in… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2011
Highly Cited
2011
BACKGROUND & AIMS Standard RECIST criteria may not be the optimal method to assess response to loco-regional therapy for… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • table 4
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
Review
2009
Review
2009
UNLABELLED The purpose of this article is to review the status and limitations of anatomic tumor response metrics including the… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • table 3
  • table 4
Is this relevant?