Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Quantum no-deleting theorem

Known as: No-deleting theorem 
In physics, the no-deleting theorem of quantum information theory is a no-go theorem which states that, in general, given two copies of some… Expand
Wikipedia

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2018
2018
Recently, Kavan Modi \emph{et al.} found that masking quantum information is impossible in bipartite scenario in [Phys. Rev. Lett… Expand
  • table I
Is this relevant?
2018
2018
Various results of the no-cloning theorem, no-deleting theorem and no-superposing theorem in quantum mechanics have been proved… Expand
Is this relevant?
Review
2017
Review
2017
According to a previous review of thermodynamics of electromagnetism, the Maxwell’s wave Equations were casted into an energy… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
This paper investigates topological reconstruction, related to the reconstruction conjecture in graph theory. We ask whether the… Expand
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
The quantum no-cloning theorem and no-deleting theorem may be the most important quantum features for quantum communications or… Expand
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and recently derived many no-go theorems including the no-cloning theorem and the no-deleting… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
It is known that the stronger no-cloning theorem and the no-deleting theorem taken together provide the permanence property of… Expand
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
A simple and unifying method to show the perfect error-correcting condition is provided based on the quantum mutual information… Expand
Is this relevant?
1996
1996
  • S. Akama
  • J. Philos. Log.
  • 1996
  • Corpus ID: 37222812
We propose contractionless constructive logic which is obtained from Nelson's constructive logic by deleting contractions. We… Expand
Is this relevant?