Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Peer Review

Known as: peer reviewed, Reviews, Peer, Peer Reviews 
A scholarly process that subjects an author's work or ideas to the scrutiny of one or more others who are experts in the field. These referees each… 
National Institutes of Health

Related topics

Related topics

6 relations
Ethical ReviewHealth evaluationlegislation & jurisprudencequality monitoring
Expand

Broader (1)

Evaluation

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2020
Review
2020
The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review
  • figure 1
Review
2013
Review
2013
Who's afraid of peer review?
Dozens of open-access journals targeted in an elaborate Science sting accepted a spoof research article, raising questions about… 
Highly Cited
2010
Highly Cited
2010
Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators
Qualitative research design can be complicated depending upon the level of experience a researcher may have with a particular… 
Highly Cited
2005
Highly Cited
2005
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds… 
Review
2001
Review
2001
A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Highly Cited
1997
Highly Cited
1997
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.
  • R. Goodman
  • Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and…
  • 1997
  • Corpus ID: 31837776
A novel behavioural screening questionnaire, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), was administered along with… 
Review
1996
Review
1996
Peer reviewed: tracking the distribution of persistent organic pollutants.
Control strategies for these contaminants will require a better understanding of how they move around the globe. 
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • table 1
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
Review
1996
Review
1996
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ
Over the past decade interest in the economic evaluation of health care interventions has risen.1 Reviews of published studies… 
Highly Cited
1985
Highly Cited
1985
Dielectric properties of fine‐grained barium titanate ceramics
Dielectric properties, lattice‐ and microstructure of ceramic BaTiO3 showing grain sizes of 0.3–100 μm were studied. At grain… 
Review
1981
Review
1981
Chance and consensus in peer review.
An experiment in which 150 proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation were evaluated independently by a new set of… 
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, and Dataset License
ACCEPT & CONTINUE