Skip to search form
Skip to main content
Skip to account menu
Semantic Scholar
Semantic Scholar's Logo
Search 218,355,004 papers from all fields of science
Search
Sign In
Create Free Account
Open Resection
Surgery to remove part or all of an organ or a tumor and nearby lymph nodes. The incision is large enough to let the surgeon see into the body.
National Institutes of Health
Create Alert
Alert
Papers overview
Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2013
Review
2013
Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: A Systematic Review and Comparison of Endoscopic, Endoscopic‐Assisted, and Open Resection in 1047 Cases
Zain Boghani
,
Qasim Husain
,
+4 authors
J. Eloy
The Laryngoscope
2013
Corpus ID: 24109296
This study is a review of the treatment outcomes of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) specifically comparing endoscopic…
Expand
Highly Cited
2006
Highly Cited
2006
Laparoscopic and Open Anterior Resection for Upper and Mid Rectal Cancer: An Evaluation of Outcomes
W. Law
,
Yee Man Lee
,
H. Choi
,
C. Seto
,
J. Ho
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
2006
Corpus ID: 13082114
PurposeThis study was designed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic anterior resection with open operation for mid and upper…
Expand
Review
2005
Review
2005
Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy
V. Velanovich
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
2005
Corpus ID: 40997543
Highly Cited
2003
Highly Cited
2003
Endoscopic management of upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma
S. Daneshmand
,
M. Quek
,
J. Huffman
Cancer
2003
Corpus ID: 36332229
The efficacy and long‐term results of endoscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) were examined. The…
Expand
Highly Cited
2003
Highly Cited
2003
Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients
F. Feliciotti
,
M. Guerrieri
,
+5 authors
E. Lezoche
Surgical Endoscopy
2003
Corpus ID: 40077184
Background: Controversy continues to surround laparoscopic rectal resection for malignancy. A longer follow-up period is required…
Expand
Highly Cited
2003
Highly Cited
2003
Prospective Comparison of Laparoscopic vs. Open Resections for Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Over a Ten-Year Period
Sanjiv K. Patankar
,
S. Larach
,
+4 authors
S. Narayanan
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
2003
Corpus ID: 23853302
AbstractPURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resections for colorectal…
Expand
Highly Cited
1997
Highly Cited
1997
Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Simon Law
,
M. Fok
,
K. Chu
,
J. Wong
Surgery
1997
Corpus ID: 22808098
Highly Cited
1996
Highly Cited
1996
Better preservation of immune function after laparoscopic-assistedvs. open bowel resection in a murine model
J. Allendorf
,
M. Bessler
,
+4 authors
M. Treat
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
1996
Corpus ID: 30240641
PURPOSE: We evaluated cell-mediated immune function after laparoscopic-assisted and open bowel resection in rats by measuring…
Expand
Review
1995
Review
1995
Laparoscopic‐assisted vs. Open resection: Rectopexy offers excellent results
R. Baker
,
A. Senagore
,
M. Luchtefeld
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
1995
Corpus ID: 22214180
PURPOSE: Anterior resection ± rectopexy effectively manages full‐thickness rectal prolapse; however, morbidity is approximately…
Expand
Highly Cited
1992
Highly Cited
1992
Arthroscopic resection of the outer end of the clavicle from a superior approach: a critical, quantitative, radiographic assessment of bone removal.
E. L. Flatow
,
F. Cordasco
,
L. Bigliani
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopy And…
1992
Corpus ID: 24007267
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our
Privacy Policy
(opens in a new tab)
,
Terms of Service
(opens in a new tab)
, and
Dataset License
(opens in a new tab)
ACCEPT & CONTINUE