Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Merocel

 
National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2011
2011
OBJECTIVE To compare Rapid Rhino and Merocel packs for nasal packing after septoplasty, in terms of patient tolerance (both with… Expand
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study was to compare postoperative pain levels between Merocel and Series 5000 nasal… Expand
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
A prospective study was performed to compare the efficacy and patient tolerance of Merocel® and Rapid Rhino® nasal tampons in the… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2005
Highly Cited
2005
OBJECTIVES A prospective non-blinded randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of Merocel and RapidRhino nasal packs in… Expand
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2004
Highly Cited
2004
OBJECTIVE This prospective randomized trial was designed to compare intranasal endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation (ESAL… Expand
Is this relevant?
2002
2002
&NA; The authors repaired a medial blow‐out fracture by using an endoscopic transnasal technique with a balloon catheter and… Expand
Is this relevant?
1996
1996
A randomised, prospective trial to evaluate Surgicel Nu-knit with Vasolene ribbon gauze and Merocel packs, respectively. Sixty… Expand
Is this relevant?
1996
1996
Over the period of a year, Merocel nasal packs were used routinely as the primary form of packing in patients referred to the… Expand
Is this relevant?
1995
1995
A prospective study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of Merocel nasal tampons to BIPP (Bismuth Subnitrate and Iodoform… Expand
Is this relevant?
1987
1987
A prospective comparison of the microbiologic safety of Merocel versus NuGauze nasal packing in 119 surgical patients is… Expand
Is this relevant?