Hylocomium

 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

1987-2016
024619872016

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2009
2009
The pleurocarpus feather moss, Hylocomium splendens, is one of two co-dominant moss species in boreal forest ecosystems and one… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 4
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Increased levels of nitrogen (N) deposition lead to enhanced N contents and reduced productivity of many… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
The antibacterial activity of methanol extracts of ten moss species and fractions prepared from 80% methanol extract of… (More)
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
Forty terrestrial moss (Hylocomium splendens) samples were collected along a 120-km-long south-north transect running through… (More)
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
Female reproductive success in the unisexual perennial clonal moss Hylocomium splendens was examined by recording, if the segment… (More)
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • figure 2
  • table 2
  • table 3
Is this relevant?
2002
2002
Net primary production (NPP) of the forest moss Hylocomium splendens increased significantly along an elevational gradient in the… (More)
Is this relevant?
2001
2001
Duplicate samples of the two terrestrial moss species Hylocomium splendens and Pleurozium schreberi, which are widely used to… (More)
Is this relevant?
1997
1997
Concentrations of 48 elements in the ground growing mosses Hylocomium splendens and Pleurozium schreberi have been compared with… (More)
Is this relevant?
1997
1997
The widespread bryophyte Hylocomium splendens was sampled in a hierarchical fashion from populations representing four… (More)
  • table 1
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • table 3
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?
1992
1992
In order to document the natural CO2 environment of the moss Hylocomium splendens, and ascertain whether or not the moss was… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?