Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Gleason pattern

National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2018
Review
2018
ABSTRACT Introduction: The Gleason grading system is one of the most important prognostic factors in prostate cancer (PCa). From… Expand
2017
2017
PURPOSE Patients with prostate cancer (PCa) containing Gleason pattern (GP) 5 disease experience a greater and earlier incidence… Expand
2016
2016
BackgroundGleason scores (GS) 3+3 and 3+4 prostate cancers (PCa) differ greatly in their clinical courses, with Gleason pattern… Expand
  • figure 1.1
  • table 1.1
  • table 1.2
  • figure 1.2
  • figure 2.1
2014
2014
The Gleason scoring system underwent revision at the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) conference in 2005. It… Expand
2014
2014
INTRODUCTION There is now increased understanding that invasive cribriform carcinoma is a relatively aggressive disease. In some… Expand
Highly Cited
2013
Highly Cited
2013
Aims:  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) modification of Gleason grading recommended that the highest… Expand
Review
2011
Review
2011
Our aims were to analyze reporting of Gleason pattern (GP) 3 and 4 prostate cancer with the ISUP 2005 Gleason grading and to… Expand
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • table 4
Highly Cited
2011
Highly Cited
2011
Aberrant promoter methylation is known to silence tumor‐suppressor genes in prostate cancer (PCa). We correlated quantitative… Expand
Highly Cited
2007
Highly Cited
2007
A differential quantitative protein expression study, comparing matched prostate cancerous and benign tissues from 31 patients… Expand
Review
2005
Review
2005
There is consensus that the Gleason system should be used for grading of prostate cancer. However, a number of controversial… Expand