Cryptosporidium suis

 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

2004-2017
02420042017

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2015
2015
Human wastewater and livestock can contribute to contamination of surface water with Cryptosporidium and Giardia. In countries… (More)
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
We investigated the distribution of Cryptosporidium in pigs in Japan by immunofluorescence staining of fecal samples and… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
The aim of the present study was to identify the species of Cryptosporidium infecting Eurasian wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Galicia… (More)
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
BACKGROUND Cryptosporidium spp. are common intestinal protozoa of humans and animals. There have been few studies conducted on… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
From 2009 to 2011, the occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. was investigated on 22 farms in the Czech Republic. A total of 1,620… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • table 2
  • table 3
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
A total of 123 fecal samples of slaughtered finisher pigs and 21 sows from 14 farms were screened for Cryptosporidium spp… (More)
  • figure 1
  • table 1
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
A total of 142 stool specimens from pigs on 24 farms from the province of Zaragoza (northeastern Spain) were screened for… (More)
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
A total of 4338 faecal samples, 135 of sows, 3368 of pre-weaned and 835 of post-weaned piglets from eight farms in South Bohemia… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2006
Highly Cited
2006
The prevalence of Cryptosporidium species in 1-2-year-old heifers was determined for 571 animals on 14 dairy farms in seven… (More)
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
Molecular and biological characteristics of a new species of Cryptosporidium from the feces of pigs (Sus scrofa) is described… (More)
  • table I
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?