Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and comparing a coronally positioned tunnel with and without platelet-rich plasma: a pilot study in humans.

@article{Shepherd2009RootCU,
  title={Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and comparing a coronally positioned tunnel with and without platelet-rich plasma: a pilot study in humans.},
  author={Neal Shepherd and Henry Greenwell and Margaret Hill and Ricardo Vidal and James P. Scheetz},
  journal={Journal of periodontology},
  year={2009},
  volume={80 3},
  pages={
          397-404
        },
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:40535008}
}
The CPT plus ADM and PRP produced defect coverage of 90%, whereas the CPT with ADM produced only 70% defect coverage, which was not statistically significant, but it may be clinically significant.

Figures and Tables from this paper

Tunnel technique versus coronally advanced flap with acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.

Both techniques were effective in root coverage of multiple recessions; however, better clinical results were achieved with CAF and ADM combination.

Acellular dermal matrix graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage in smokers: a randomized clinical study.

Smoking may negatively affect the results achieved through periodontal plastic procedures; however, the association of ADMG and EMD is beneficial in the root coverage of gingival recessions in smokers, 6 months after the surgery.

Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft or xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Within the limits of the study, M-CAF combined with XADM or CTG seems to be similarly effective in RD reduction of class I and II multiple gingival recessions at least in the short term.

Effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix graft with a coronally advanced flap for the treatment of Miller Class I/II single gingival recession with thin gingival phenotype: study protocol for a split-mouth randomised controlled trial

The objective of this split-mouth; randomised, controlled, clinical study is to evaluate the long-term effects of ADM graft (ADMG) combined with CAF on root coverage, aesthetics and patient satisfaction for the treatment of single gingival recession with thinGingival phenotype.

Comparative Evaluation of Coronally Advanced Flap Procedure in Conjunction with Amniotic Membrane Versus Coronally Advanced Flap with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane in Patients with Miller's Class I and II Gingival Recession Defects

Significant difference was found between Group A (CAF+ PRF) and Group B ( CAF+ AM) membrane treated sites in reduction of PPD, gain in clinical attachment level, reduction of GRD from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months, with more significant results seen with Group B.

Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix with Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions: A Randomized, Parallel-Design Clinical Trial.

The use of ADM may represent an alternative to SCTG when used in conjunction with MCAT in the management of multiple adjacent gingival recessions and patient satisfaction with esthetic outcome 9 months after treatment did not differ.

The Adjunctive Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin to Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Buccal Recession Defects: Results of a Randomized, Parallel-Group Controlled Trial.

According to the results, the addition of PRF did not further develop the outcomes of CAF + CTG treatment except increasing the TT, and this single trial is not sufficient to advocate the true clinical effect ofPRF on recession treatment with CAF - CTG, and additional trials are needed.

Comparative Evaluation of Coronally Advanced Flap Using Amniotic Membrane and Platelet-rich Fibrin Membrane in Gingival Recession: An 18-Month Clinical Study

It is demonstrated that both CAF + PRF andCAF + AM are equally effective in providing clinically significant outcomes with respect to root coverage with AM showing the better percentage of root coverage as compared to PRF.
...

Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and comparing a coronally positioned tunnel to a coronally positioned flap approach.

The coronally positioned flap plus acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allograft produced a defect coverage of 95%, whereas the tunnel technique plus ADM produced only 78% coverage.

Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and comparing a coronally positioned tunnel to a coronally positioned flap approach

This randomized, controlled, masked clinical trial was to compare the percentage of root coverage obtained with a coronally positioned flap plus acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allograft to that of a tunnel technique plus ADM 4 months post-surgically.

The clinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coverage compared to coronally positioned flap alone.

Treatment with a CPF plus an ADM allograft significantly increased gingival thickness when compared with aCPF alone, and Recession defect coverage was significantly improved with the use of ADM.

Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft.

Treatment with ADM was an effective and predictable procedure for root coverage and the orientation of the material did not affect the treatment outcome for any of the parameters tested.

Use of platelet gel with connective tissue grafts for root coverage: a randomized-controlled trial.

Treatment of recession with CTG or a CTG-PRP combination resulted in favourable clinical outcomes, however, no difference could be found between CTG and CTG+PRP.

A comparative study of root coverage with connective tissue and platelet concentrate grafts: 8-month results.

The platelet concentrate graft may be an alternative graft material for treating gingival recession and treatment with this graft may result in better esthetic appearance.

The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure: a pilot human trial.

Based on the results of this pilot study, the application of PRP in CAF root coverage procedure provides no clinically measurable enhancements on the final therapeutic outcomes of CAF in Miller's Class I recession defects.

Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Flap with tension versus flap without tension: a randomized controlled clinical study.

This study shows that minimal flap tension does not influence recession reduction after 3 months when shallow recessions are treated by means of CAF.

Histologic evaluation of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans.

Although CT and ADM have a slightly different histological appearance, both can successfully be used to cover denuded roots with similar attachments and no adverse healing.

Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A 19-case series.

The results of this study indicate that there is a direct relation between flap thickness and recession reduction (P <0.0001), and flap thickness >0.8 mm was associated with 100% of root coverage.