How have COVID‐19 stringency measures changed scholarly activity?

@article{Caudwell2022HowHC,
  title={How have COVID‐19 stringency measures changed scholarly activity?},
  author={Kim M. Caudwell and Alessandro Soranzo and Lee Wei Lim and Luca Aquili},
  journal={Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences},
  year={2022},
  volume={1513},
  pages={5 - 9},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247583480}
}
Government restrictions to the movement of people due to the COVID‐19 pandemic have had a wide range of effects on scientific activity. Here, we show that during the pandemic there has been a reduction in the number of registered non‐COVID‐19 clinical trials. Furthermore, using the Oxford COVID‐19 Government Response Tracker Stringency Index (SI) as an indicator of COVID‐19–related workplace adjustment (e.g., restrictions on gatherings, workplace closures, and stay‐at‐home orders), we… 
2 Citations

Perspectives on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Research: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Pediatric Otolaryngologists

The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped research within pediatric otolaryngology, with a mixed impact on the amount of time allocated to research endeavors, depending on individual circumstances and priorities.

Engagement and Burnout in Times of COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis Based on Healthy Organizational Practices

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted a closer examination of organizational management’s role in facilitating positive outcomes in the workplace. This study explores the relationship between

A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker)

The Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) is introduced, a dataset that addresses the need for continuously updated, readily usable and comparable information on policy measures and enables researchers and policymakers to explore the empirical effects of policy responses on the spread of CO VID-19 cases and deaths.

Academic careers and the COVID-19 pandemic: Reversing the tide

The impact of the pandemic on overall research operations is discussed, its disproportionate effect on underrepresented minority researchers is examined, and concrete strategies to reverse these losses are provided.

Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists

A survey of principal investigators indicates that female scientists, those in the ‘bench sciences’ and, especially, scientists with young children experienced a substantial decline in time devoted to research under COVID-19.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with dementia

Research from 2020 has shown that people with Alzheimer disease and dementia have a relatively high risk of contracting severe COVID-19, and are also at risk of neuropsychiatric disturbances as a result of lockdown measures and social isolation.

Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on acute stroke care

A 24% decrease in suspected stroke presentations during the COVID-19 outbreak is observed, but no evidence for a decrease in quality of acute stroke care is observed.

The Impact of COVID-19 Infection and Enforced Prolonged Social Isolation on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Older Adults With and Without Dementia: A Review

The available evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has a wide negative impact on the mental well-being of older adults with and without dementia.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the spectrum of cancer care, including delaying diagnoses and treatment and halting clinical trials. In response, healthcare systems are rapidly reorganizing

A generation of junior faculty is at risk from the impacts of COVID-19

For junior investigators starting their independent careers, the challenges of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic extend beyond lost time and are career threatening. Without

Understanding randomised controlled trials

Issues that need to be considered during the critical appraisal of randomised controlled trials, such as assessing the validity of trial methodology and the magnitude and precision of the treatment effect, and deciding on the applicability of research results are discussed.

Randomised controlled trials – the gold standard for effectiveness research

Learning points Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the reference standard for studying causal relationships between interventions and outcomes as randomisation eliminates much of the bias