thallium-201

Known as: thallium 201 
 
National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Highly Cited
2009
Highly Cited
2009
OBJECTIVES Our purpose was to describe a novel, rapid stress thallium-201 (Tl-201)/rest technetium-99m (Tc-99m) agent myocardial… (More)
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • table 4
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
1997
Highly Cited
1997
OBJECTIVES This prospective study was conducted in 115 women to directly compare the sensitivity and specificity of thallium-201… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
1997
Highly Cited
1997
OBJECTIVES We sought to evaluate the comparative accuracy of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), quantitative rest… (More)
Is this relevant?
1993
1993
Technetium-99m (Tc-99m) tetrofosmin, a new myocardial perfusion imaging agent, was evaluated at exercise and rest in 50 patients… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
1991
Highly Cited
1991
The diagnostic performance of rubidium-82 (Rb-82) positron emission tomography (PET) and thallium-201 (Tl-201) single-photon… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • table II
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?
Review
1991
Review
1991
Left ventricular (LV) performance is reduced in a large subset of patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and LV… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
1989
Highly Cited
1989
To compare stress/rest technetium 99m methoxy isobutyl isonitrile (Tc-MIBI) with stress redistribution thallium 201(T1-201… (More)
Is this relevant?
1987
1987
Dipyridamole thallium 201 scintigraphy (DTS) was used to screen 116 consecutive patients referred for aortic reconstructive… (More)
Is this relevant?
1985
1985
The goal of this study was to determine the prognostic value of a normal exercise thallium-201 (TI-201) scintigram by… (More)
Is this relevant?
1976
1976
The appearance of the right ventricular myocardium on thallium 201 myocardial perfusion images was evaluated in patients with… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?