pancreatography

Known as: pancreatogram 
 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

1950-2017
024619502016

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Highly Cited
2006
Highly Cited
2006
1 The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi, Japan 2 Center for Health, Safety and… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • table 3
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
BACKGROUND Despite the recent improvement in techniques and patient selection, post-ERCP pancreatitis remains the most frequent… (More)
Is this relevant?
2001
2001
BACKGROUND Pancreatitis is the commonest and most significant complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography… (More)
Is this relevant?
1997
1997
The accessory pancreatic duct (APD) is the smaller and less constant pancreatic duct. The patency of the APD was investigated… (More)
Is this relevant?
1996
1996
Endoscopic retrograde pancreatogram (ERP) has been recommended in patients with suspected pancreatic fistula to visualize the… (More)
Is this relevant?
1994
1994
Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCPs are complicated by pancreatitis in 1% to 10% of patients, and evidence suggests that the… (More)
Is this relevant?
1991
1991
The effect of the long-acting somatostatin analogue, octreotide acetate (Sandostatin) on enzyme elevation after endoscopic… (More)
Is this relevant?
1985
1985
The relationship between pancreas divisum and pancreatic disease has been studied in a series of 304 patients. This congenital… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
1984
Highly Cited
1984
Terminology in classification of pancreatograms was discussed at a recent international workshop on chronic pancreatitis. A new… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?
1976
1976
Pure pancreatic juice has been collected from 61 patients at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?