FAQ

methodological quality

 

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

2011-2017
0102020112017

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2017
2017
Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the methodological quality of the Palestinian Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Mellitus using the… (More)
  • table 2
  • table 1
  • table 3
  • table 4
Is this relevant?
Review
2017
Review
2017
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
BACKGROUND Guidelines for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews (SRs) were developed to contribute… (More)
  • figure 1
  • table 2
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • table 4
Is this relevant?
Review
2017
Review
2017
The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality.
OBJECTIVES To assess the quality of published systematic reviews in the urology literature (an extension of our previously… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?
Review
2017
Review
2017
The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar.
OBJECTIVES To compare the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews by authors from China and those from the… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 3
  • table 4
  • table 5
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
Review
2016
Review
2016
Guidance on assessing the methodological and reporting quality of toxicologically relevant studies: A scoping review.
Assessments of methodological and reporting quality are critical to adequately judging the credibility of a study's conclusions… (More)
  • table 1
  • figure 1
  • table 2
  • figure 2
  • table 4
Is this relevant?
Review
2015
Review
2015
The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the methodological assessment tools for pre-clinical and clinical studies, systematic review… (More)
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
Review
2015
Review
2015
The reporting characteristics and methodological quality of Cochrane reviews about health policy research.
The systematic review has increasingly become a popular tool for researching health policy. However, due to the complexity and… (More)
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
Differences in methodological quality between positive and negative published clinical trials.
AIM Comparison of methodological quality differences in nursing clinical trials with positive and negative findings. BACKGROUND… (More)
Is this relevant?
Review
2014
Review
2014
Development of a Valid and Reliable Knee Articular Cartilage Condition–Specific Study Methodological Quality Score
BACKGROUND Condition-specific questionnaires are important components in evaluation of outcomes of surgical interventions. No… (More)
  • table 1
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • table 2
Is this relevant?
2011
2011
Testing the allegiance bias hypothesis: a meta-analysis.
This meta-analysis investigated whether the association between researcher allegiance (RA) and the relative effect of two… (More)
  • table I
  • table II
  • table III
  • table IV
  • figure I
Is this relevant?