Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

methodological quality

 
National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2017
Review
2017
The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar.
OBJECTIVES To compare the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews by authors from China and those from the… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • figure 1
  • table 4
Is this relevant?
2017
2017
Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation
Objectives To evaluate the methodological quality of the Palestinian Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Mellitus using the… Expand
  • table 2
  • table 1
  • table 3
  • table 4
Is this relevant?
Review
2016
Review
2016
Critical appraisal of questionnaires to assess functional impairment in individuals with mild cognitive impairment.
BACKGROUND Mild deficits in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) have consistently been reported in the individuals… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 1
  • table 3
  • table 4
Is this relevant?
Review
2016
Review
2016
Visual analogue scale (VAS) measurement of antiretroviral adherence in people living with HIV (PLWH): a meta-analysis
Effective treatment of HIV hinges upon maintaining adequate antiretroviral therapy adherence. Accurate, cost-effective… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • table 1
  • table 1
  • table 1
Is this relevant?
2016
2016
Instructions for Using the MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
La evaluacion de la calidad metodologica (CM) en la investigacion biomedica es un area de desarrollo dinamico en los ultimos anos… Expand
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
Review
2015
Review
2015
The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the methodological assessment tools for pre-clinical and clinical studies, systematic review… Expand
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
Reliability and validity of MINCIR scale for methodological quality in dental therapy research.
The clinical paradigm of evidence-based medicine requires a foundation of good quality research upon which clinical and… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
Confiabilidad de la escala MINCIR para valorar calidad metodológica de estudios de terapia
Validation of a scale for assessing methodological quality of therapy studies. Pilot study Introduction: The methodological… Expand
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
Productividad y calidad metodológica de artículos clínicos en cirugía oral y maxilofacial en Chile: Período 2001-2012
Productivity and methodological quality of clinical articles in oral and maxillofacial surgery in Chile. Period 2001-2012… Expand
Is this relevant?
2011
2011
Testing the allegiance bias hypothesis: a meta-analysis.
This meta-analysis investigated whether the association between researcher allegiance (RA) and the relative effect of two… Expand
  • table I
  • table II
  • table III
  • table IV
  • figure I
Is this relevant?
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, and Dataset License
ACCEPT & CONTINUE