colposacropexy

Known as: abdominal sacrocolpopexy 
 
National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2012
2012
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare symptomatic and anatomic outcomes 1 year after robotic vs abdominal… (More)
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
OBJECTIVE Limited data exist on the rates of pelvic organ prolapse procedures utilizing mesh. The objective of this study was to… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
OBJECTIVE To evaluate longer-term clinical outcomes after robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of advanced… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
Is this relevant?
2010
2010
STUDY OBJECTIVE To perform a cost-minimization analysis comparing robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy… (More)
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2008
Highly Cited
2008
OBJECTIVE To compare short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy with abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse… (More)
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
Mesh colposacropexy is a procedure performed for massive genital prolapse with a good success rate and a low incidence of… (More)
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
INTRODUCTION Colposacropexy (CSP), with or without hysterectomy, is a valid technique for the repair of severe urogenital… (More)
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
Nineteen women who had an abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) with synthetic mesh and 18 women who had an ASC with freeze-dried… (More)
  • figure 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
1998
1998
This study focusses on abdominal sacral colpopexy which appears to provide the most anatomically correct restoration and secure… (More)
Is this relevant?
1990
1990
A retrospective analysis of 59 patients who underwent colposacropexy (CSP) using Prolene (polypropylene) mesh is presented. Fifty… (More)
Is this relevant?