arachidonyl dopamine

Known as: N-arachidonoyldopamine 
 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

2002-2018
012320022018

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2014
2014
The transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channel, a nonselective Ca(2+) and Na(+) channel, is a molecular transducer… (More)
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
Endocannabinoids exert numerous effects in the CNS under physiological and pathological conditions. The aim of the present study… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?
2009
2009
Endogenous analogues of capsaicin, N-acyldopamines, were previously identified from striatal extracts, but the putative… (More)
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
A series of 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridyl-4-carboxamides, exemplified by 6, have been synthesized and evaluated for in vitro TRPV1… (More)
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
N-Acyldopamines were recently described as putative endogenous substances in the rat brain. Among them, N-arachidonoyldopamine… (More)
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
In RIN m5F rat insulinoma beta-cells, agonists at cannabinoid CB(1) receptors modulate insulin release. Here we investigated in… (More)
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
Abbreviations. – AA, Arachidonic acid; AEA, arachidonoylethanolamide (anandamide); 2-AG, 2arachidonoylglycerol; CNS, central… (More)
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
The vascular effects of cannabinoids have been compared in the rat isolated aorta. Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), anandamide… (More)
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
Endogenous N-acyl dopamines such as N-arachidonoyldopamine (NADA) and N-oleoyldopamine have been recently identified as a new… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2003
Highly Cited
2003
N-Arachidonoyldopamine (NADA) was recently identified as an endogenous ligand for the vanilloid type 1 receptor (VR1). Further… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • table I
  • table II
Is this relevant?