# YAU 17, (trans)-isomer

## Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.

Highly Cited

2005

Highly Cited

2005

- 2005

We study the large volume limit of the scalar potential in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications of type IIB string theory. Underâ€¦Â (More)

Is this relevant?

Highly Cited

2003

Highly Cited

2003

- 2003

We construct a cubic field theory which provides all genus amplitudes of the topological A-model for all non-compact Calabi-Yauâ€¦Â (More)

Is this relevant?

Highly Cited

2000

Highly Cited

2000

- 2000

We show how turning on Flux for RR (and NS-NS) field strengths on non-compact Calabi-Yau 3-folds can serve as a way to partiallyâ€¦Â (More)

Is this relevant?

Highly Cited

2000

Highly Cited

2000

- 2000

We consider a class of special Lagrangian subspaces of Calabi-Yau manifolds and identify their mirrors, using the recentâ€¦Â (More)

Is this relevant?

Highly Cited

1998

Highly Cited

1998

- 1998

Just as parallel threebranes on a smooth manifold are related to string theory on AdS5 Ã— S, parallel threebranes near a conicalâ€¦Â (More)

Is this relevant?

Highly Cited

1998

Highly Cited

1998

- 1998

The 't Hooft expansion of SU(N) Chern-Simons theory on S' is proposed to be exactly dual to the topological closed string theoryâ€¦Â (More)

Is this relevant?

Highly Cited

1996

Highly Cited

1996

- 1996

We study the boundary states of D-branes wrapped around supersymmetric cycles in a general Calabi-Yau manifold. In particular, weâ€¦Â (More)

Is this relevant?

Highly Cited

1996

Highly Cited

1996

- 1996

In a certain strong coupling limit, compactification of the E8 Ã—E8 heterotic string on a Calabi-Yau manifold X can be describedâ€¦Â (More)

Is this relevant?

Highly Cited

1995

Highly Cited

1995

- 1995

We search for N = 2, d = 4 theories which can be realized both as heterotic string compactifications on K3 Ã—T 2 and as type IIâ€¦Â (More)

Is this relevant?

Highly Cited

1994

Highly Cited

1994

- 1994

We consider families F(âˆ†) consisting of complex (n âˆ’ 1)-dimensional projective algebraic compactifications of âˆ†-regular affineâ€¦Â (More)

Is this relevant?