Richard Crandall

Known as: Crandall, Richard 
Richard E. Crandall (December 29, 1947 – December 20, 2012) was an American physicist and computer scientist who made contributions to computational… (More)
Wikipedia

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

1996-2015
01219962015

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2015
2015
This paper extends tools developed by Richard Crandall in [16] to provide robust, high-precision methods for computation of the… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • table 1
Is this relevant?
2015
2015
In [7] the current authors, along with the late and much-missed Richard Crandall (1947– 2012), considered generalized Mordell… (More)
  • table 2
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
Richard Crandall liked to call himself a “computationalist”. For though he was trained in physics (and served for many years as a… (More)
Is this relevant?
Review
2013
Review
2013
A salt crystal is made up of alternate positive and negative electric charges based on a simple cubic lattice. The electrostatic… (More)
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
[1] Lebendige Zahlen, volume 1 of Mathematische Miniaturen [Mathematical Miniatures]. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1981. Fünf… (More)
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
1. Introduction In the past few years, computation of definite integrals to high precision has emerged as a very useful tool in… (More)
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
In a recent paper, Richard Crandall and the present author established that each of a certain class of explicitly given real… (More)
Is this relevant?
2003
2003
We extend the work of Richard Crandall et al. to demonstrate how the Discrete Weighted Transform (DWT) can be applied to speed up… (More)
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
1996
1996
We report on a joint project with Joe Buhler, Richard Crandall, Reijo Ernvall, and Tauno Metss ankyll a dealing with the… (More)
Is this relevant?
1996
1996
One of the charms of mathematics is that it is possible to make elementary discoveries about objects that have been studied for… (More)
Is this relevant?