Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver

Known as: RECICL 
Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL) proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (2009 revised version). (Kudo M, Kubo… Expand
National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2019
2019
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is inappropriate to assess the direct effects of treatment on… Expand
Is this relevant?
2018
2018
AIM To evaluate the potential value of texture analysis (TA) based on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for… Expand
Is this relevant?
2016
2016
The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is inappropriate to assess the direct effects of treatment on… Expand
Is this relevant?
2016
2016
The goal of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of balloon‐occluded transarterial chemoembolization (B‐TACE) of… Expand
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
BackgroundTo test the hypothesis that use of the response evaluation criteria in cancer of the liver (RECICL), an improved… Expand
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
AIM We aimed to retrospectively examine the tolerability and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with… Expand
  • figure 1
  • table II
  • table I
  • table III
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
PURPOSE In order to detect an early response to anti-angiogenic therapy, this study aims at analyzing specific effects of a… Expand
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2010
Highly Cited
2010
The World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are inappropriate to… Expand
Is this relevant?
2010
2010
 
Is this relevant?