RDF/XML

RDF/XML is a syntax, defined by the W3C, to express (i.e. serialize) an RDF graph as an XML document. RDF/XML is sometimes misleadingly called simply… (More)
Wikipedia

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Highly Cited
2008
Highly Cited
2008
With currently available tools and languages, translating between an existing XML format and RDF is a tedious and error-prone… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
When querying or reasoning on metadata from the semantic web, the source of this metadata can be of great importance. While the… (More)
  • figure 2
  • figure 6
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
RDF/XML does not layer RDF on top of XML ina useful way. We use a simple direct representation of the RDF abstract syntax in XML… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2004
Highly Cited
2004
This specification describes the FOAF language, defined as a dictionary of named properties and classes using W3C's RDF… (More)
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
Many approaches to writing RDF in XML have been proposed. The revised standard RDF/XML still has many known problems. It is not… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2003
2003
Omnipaper (Smart Access to European Newspapers, IST-2001-32174) is a project from the European Commission IST program… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?
2003
2003
The paper describes on-going work on generating dialogue responses on two levels: first, generation of factual responses from RDF… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2003
Highly Cited
2003
 
Is this relevant?
2002
2002
It is difficult to serialize an RDF graph as a humanly readable RDF/XML document. This paper describes the approach taken in Jena… (More)
Is this relevant?
2001
2001
parsing, coroutines, XML, RDF, inversion RDF/XML is defined using two grammars, that for XML over text, and that for RDF over XML… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?