Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Procas

 
National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2016
2016
 
Is this relevant?
2015
2015
Breast cancer risk is continuing to increase across all societies with rates in countries with traditionally lower risks catching… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
Caspofungin is an echinocandin with proven efficacy in invasive candidiasis (IC) and invasive aspergillosis (IA). This… Expand
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
INTRODUCTION Caspofungin is an echinocandin with proven efficacy in invasive candidiasis (IC) and invasive aspergillosis (IA… Expand
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
espanolIntroduccion. Caspofungina es una equinocandina con eficacia probada en candidiasis invasiva (CI) y aspergilosis invasiva… Expand
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
Introducción. Caspofungina es una equinocandina con eficacia probada en candidiasis invasiva (CI) y aspergilosis invasiva (AI… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 1
  • table 3
  • table 4
Is this relevant?
2006
2006
...........................................................................................................................................4 Introduction .. .....................................................................................................................................4 Methods .. ...........................................................................................................................................5 Taxonomy ........................................................................................................................................8 Procas Stephens, 183 1 ...............................................................................................................9 Key to species of Procas Stephens, 1831 ................................................................................ 11 Procas granulicollis Walton .....................................................................................................13 Procas picipes (Marsham) .......................................................................................................16 Procas picipes picipes (Marsham) ...........................................................................................17 Procas picipes steveni (Gyllenhal) ...........................................................................................21 Procas picipes levantinus subsp. n. .........................................................................................23 Procas michaelis sp. n. ............................................................................................................ 24 Procas armillatus (Fabricius) ..................................................................................................25 Procas biguttatus Faust ............................................................................................................29 Procas lecontei Bedel ..............................................................................................................31 Phylogeny ................................................................................................................... ...................32 Species incertae sedis .....................................................................................................................33 Procas rasus Desbrochers ........................................................................................................33 Procas sibiricus Pic ..................................................................................................................33 Procas maculatus Pic ...............................................................................................................34 Procas pyrrhodactylus, sensu Stephens, not Marsha m ............................................................34 Nomenclatural changes ...................................................................................................................35 Acknowledgements . .. .....................................................................................................................35 References ....................................................................................................................................36 
Is this relevant?
Review
1998
Review
1998
Smeys ~S) pro~a suppofls my stidies &si~ed to hcreme ~dasbtig of the labor mkti md methtis of &h mIlwtion, ~e Dismssion Papers… Expand
Is this relevant?