Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Procas

National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Highly Cited
2016
Highly Cited
2016
1Department of Genomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Central… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • figure 1
  • table 4
2015
2015
Breast cancer risk is continuing to increase across all societies with rates in countries with traditionally lower risks catching… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
2013
2013
Caspofungin is an echinocandin with proven efficacy in invasive candidiasis (IC) and invasive aspergillosis (IA). This… Expand
2012
2012
INTRODUCTION Caspofungin is an echinocandin with proven efficacy in invasive candidiasis (IC) and invasive aspergillosis (IA… Expand
2012
2012
espanolIntroduccion. Caspofungina es una equinocandina con eficacia probada en candidiasis invasiva (CI) y aspergilosis invasiva… Expand
2006
2006
...........................................................................................................................................4 Introduction .. .....................................................................................................................................4 Methods .. ...........................................................................................................................................5 Taxonomy ........................................................................................................................................8 Procas Stephens, 183 1 ...............................................................................................................9 Key to species of Procas Stephens, 1831 ................................................................................ 11 Procas granulicollis Walton .....................................................................................................13 Procas picipes (Marsham) .......................................................................................................16 Procas picipes picipes (Marsham) ...........................................................................................17 Procas picipes steveni (Gyllenhal) ...........................................................................................21 Procas picipes levantinus subsp. n. .........................................................................................23 Procas michaelis sp. n. ............................................................................................................ 24 Procas armillatus (Fabricius) ..................................................................................................25 Procas biguttatus Faust ............................................................................................................29 Procas lecontei Bedel ..............................................................................................................31 Phylogeny ................................................................................................................... ...................32 Species incertae sedis .....................................................................................................................33 Procas rasus Desbrochers ........................................................................................................33 Procas sibiricus Pic ..................................................................................................................33 Procas maculatus Pic ...............................................................................................................34 Procas pyrrhodactylus, sensu Stephens, not Marsha m ............................................................34 Nomenclatural changes ...................................................................................................................35 Acknowledgements . .. .....................................................................................................................35 References ....................................................................................................................................36 
Review
1998
Review
1998
Smeys ~S) pro~a suppofls my stidies &si~ed to hcreme ~dasbtig of the labor mkti md methtis of &h mIlwtion, ~e Dismssion Papers… Expand