Instrumental delivery

Known as: Unspecified instrumental delivery 
 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

2002-2017
0520022017

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2017
2017
BACKGROUND We sought to investigate the impact of the duration of second stage of labor on risk of severe perineal lacerations… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
Is this relevant?
2015
2015
OBJECTIVES Levator ani muscle (LAM) injury is common after first vaginal delivery, and a higher incidence is associated with… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • table 4
  • table 5
Is this relevant?
2015
2015
OBJECTIVES To identify risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery… (More)
Is this relevant?
2015
2015
OBJECTIVE Fetal size impacts on perinatal outcomes. We queried whether the fetal head, as the fetal part interfacing with the… (More)
  • figure 4
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • table 4
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of maternal BMI on intrapartum interventions and adverse outcomes that may influence choice of… (More)
Is this relevant?
2014
2014
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the frequency and to identify the risk factors of severe perineal lacerations and the subgroup of women… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2013
Highly Cited
2013
OBJECTIVE To describe the trends of severe perineal tears in England and to investigate to what extent the changes in related… (More)
Is this relevant?
2013
2013
OBJECTIVE To compare the obstetric outcomes of pregnant women after successful external cephalic version (ECV) (cases) with a… (More)
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
INTRODUCTION In this retrospective study we investigate the differences regarding the mode of delivery between Greek and… (More)
Is this relevant?
2002
2002
OBJECTIVES To measure levels of and changes in compliance with evidence-based recommendations in obstetrics in the UK. To… (More)
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?