Gyrus occipitotemporalis medialis (Nomina)

 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

1981-2017
01219812017

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2012
Review
2012
descriptions appropriately describe the given behavior. However, because the different LCM categories elicit different cognitive… (More)
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
Review
2011
Review
2011
We would like to share with you and your readers our thoughts with regard to the case report by Moores (2011). Several passages… (More)
Is this relevant?
2010
2010
The etymological evolution of the anatomical terms larynx, cricoid, glottis, epiglottis, and thyroid (cartilage) dates to… (More)
Is this relevant?
Review
2008
Review
2008
The anatomical terminology is a base for medical communication. It is elaborated into a nomenclature in Latin. Its history goes… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • table 1
  • table 2
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
cibus gato, fuscis; non undatis. ..... Spec. b, (veris: junior avis,) rostro apice eloncolore sordidiore, lunulis apicalibus… (More)
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
  • Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift
  • 2005
R e n d l e . Keeper, Depar tment of Botany, Brit ish Muse,Jm (Natura l History), Cromwell Road, London, S. W. Das… (More)
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
Heutigen Tages ist es seitens der Direktionen botanischer Garten allgemein iiblich, nach AbschluB einer (mitunter auch erst… (More)
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
At present, three different systems of anatomical nomenclature are available to researchers describing new tetrapod taxa: a… (More)
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
Review
2004
Review
2004
This paper compared and considered terms of general anatomy from the Basle Nomina Anatomica (1895) to the Terminologia Anatomica… (More)
Is this relevant?
Review
1981
Review
1981
In this study the history of anatomical nomenclatures is described, the Basle Nomina Anatomica (BNA), Jena Nomina Anatomica (JNA… (More)
Is this relevant?