Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Ficus paraensis

Known as: Ficus paraensis (Miq.) Miq. 
 
National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2016
2016
EQUACOES DE VOLUME PARA QUALEA PARAENSIS E ERISMA UNCINATUM PARA O NORTE DE MATO GROSSO A utilizacao de modelos estatisticos na… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
2009
2009
A new species of Rhodnius is described and illustrated from a male specimen from northeastern Brazil. The specimen was found died… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 5-6
  • figure 2-4
  • figure 7-10
  • figure 11-12
Is this relevant?
2009
2009
OBJECTIVES The known anti-protozoal activity of flavonoids has stimulated the testing of other derivatives from natural and… Expand
Is this relevant?
Review
2006
Review
2006
Strong, Mark T. Taxonomy and distribution of Rhynchospora (Cyperaceae) in the Guianas, South America. Contributions from the… Expand
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 5
  • figure 7
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
This paper deals with some interesting new fungi which are described as a contribution for the development of the Mycogeography… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 5
  • figure 7
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
The influence of plant species on soil nitrogen (N) dynamics was investigated in lowland Amazonia, Brazil under plantations of… Expand
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3
  • table 4
  • table 5
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
The genus Coccoloba is represented in Brazilian Amazonia by twenty three species: Coccoloba acuminata Kunth, C. arborescens (Vell… Expand
Is this relevant?
2002
2002
  • Ralph Lainson
  • Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
  • 2002
  • Corpus ID: 19309025
Eimeria carmelinoi n.sp., is described in the teiid lizard Kentropyx calcarata Spix, 1825 from north Brazil. Oocysts subspherical… Expand
  • figure 1-14
  • figure 15-21
  • figure 22
  • figure 32-39
  • figure 40-41
Is this relevant?
1983
1983
 
Is this relevant?