Skip to search formSkip to main content
You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly.

Dacrydium <mytilid bivalve>

Known as: Dacrydium 
 
National Institutes of Health

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2014
2014
Abstract The Mukah coal accumulated in the Balingian Formation where the time-stratigraphic position is poorly defined by fauna… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
The occurrence of the non-indigenous species Limnoperna securis belonging to Mytilidae family is recorded for the first time in… Expand
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • figure 2
Is this relevant?
2011
2011
Host bark traits are known to affect the characteristics of epiphyte communities in forests worldwide; however, few… Expand
  • table 1
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
2010
2010
Upwelling intensity modifies coastal primary production and influences individual traits of habitat-forming species. Along the… Expand
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
Given that changes in population size are slow, information on future prospects of long-lived tree species is necessarily… Expand
  • table 1
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • table 2
Is this relevant?
2007
2007
The Bivalvia (Mollusca) fauna was studied from benthic samples collected from 101 stations from various biotopes in the Turkish… Expand
Is this relevant?
2005
2005
We assessed the relative limitations to photosynthesis imposed by stomatal and non-stomatal processes in Dacrydium cupressinum… Expand
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
We document an increase in house mouse (Mus musculus) abundance in a year (2002) when there was light beech (Nothofagus species… Expand
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • table 1
Is this relevant?
1994
1994
The distribution and bed structure of the two mytilid bivalves, Septifer virgatus and Hormomya mutabilis, were investigated on… Expand
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • table 1
  • figure 4
  • figure 5
Is this relevant?
1970
1970
5 Interspecific relationships 48 INTRODUCTION 5 Predation 49 Location and geologic setting 5 Competition 50 Previous work 7… Expand
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 4
Is this relevant?