Contact Lenses Consent

Known as: Contact Lenses 
 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

1938-2017
010203019382016

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2016
2016
PURPOSE Most studies have reported only minimal reductions in myopia progression with bifocal or progressive multifocal… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 1
Is this relevant?
2016
2016
PURPOSE To compare the objective and subjective visual performance of a novel contact lens which extends depth of focus by… (More)
  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?
2012
2012
The aim of this study was to determine the influence of hyaluronic acid (HA) on lysozyme sorption in model contact lenses… (More)
Is this relevant?
2009
2009
Hydrogels were the first biomaterials designed for clinical use. Their discovery and applications as soft contact lenses and… (More)
Is this relevant?
2009
2009
Many iris recognition systems operate under the assumption that non-cosmetic contact lenses will not affect match quality and the… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 4
  • figure 3
  • figure 6
Is this relevant?
2009
2009
The use of contact lenses has been reported to result in increased acuity and reduced nystagmus in subjects with congenital… (More)
  • figure I
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?
2009
2009
PURPOSE Previous studies in the United States have evaluated the benefits of soft contact lenses (CLs) in 8- to 12-year-old… (More)
Is this relevant?
2008
2008
Current dry eye treatment includes delivering comfort agents to the eye via drops, but low bioavailability and multiple… (More)
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
  • table I
Is this relevant?
2004
2004
To evaluate the relationship between ocular discomfort in the initial wearing of rigid gas permeable contact lenses (RGPCL) and… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?
1961
1961
  • F Ridley
  • The British journal of ophthalmology
  • 1961
 
Is this relevant?