(18F)T807 compound

Known as: F-18-AV-1451, T-807, (F-18)-AV-1451 
 
National Institutes of Health

Topic mentions per year

Topic mentions per year

2016-2018
02420162018

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
2017
2017
BACKGROUND Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is difficult to diagnose accurately. The recently developed tau PET tracers may… (More)
Is this relevant?
2017
2017
Diverse neurodegenerative disorders are characterized by deposition of tau fibrils composed of conformers (i.e. strains) unique… (More)
Is this relevant?
2017
2017
18F-AV-1451 is currently the most widely used of several experimental tau PET tracers. The objective of this study was to… (More)
Is this relevant?
2017
2017
INTRODUCTION Tau-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with AV1451 is sensitive to Alzheimer disease (AD)-related tau… (More)
  • table 1
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?
2017
2017
Importance Previous postmortem studies have long demonstrated that neurofibrillary tangles made of hyperphosphorylated tau… (More)
Is this relevant?
2017
2017
β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau pathology become increasingly prevalent with age, however, the spatial relationship between the two… (More)
  • table 1
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
  • figure 4
Is this relevant?
2016
2016
BACKGROUND It is essential to determine the specificity of AV-1451 PET for tau in brain imaging by using pathological comparisons… (More)
Is this relevant?
2016
2016
OBJECTIVE To better understand cross-sectional relationships between CSF and PET measures of tau pathology, we compared regional… (More)
Is this relevant?
2016
2016
The tau tangle ligand (18)F-AV-1451 ((18)F-T807) binds to neuromelanin in the midbrain, and may therefore be a measure of the… (More)
Is this relevant?
Highly Cited
2016
Highly Cited
2016
SEE SARAZIN ET AL DOI101093/BRAIN/AWW041 FOR A SCIENTIFIC COMMENTARY ON THIS ARTICLE: The advent of the positron emission… (More)
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • figure 1
  • figure 2
  • figure 3
Is this relevant?