Corpus ID: 18833698

it as “Notes on ‘The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience ’ by Selim Berker.”

@inproceedings{Berker2010itA,
  title={it as “Notes on ‘The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience ’ by Selim Berker.”},
  author={Selim Berker and J. Greene},
  year={2010}
}
What follows is a set of notes that I prepared for a small meeting of philosophers and scientists at Arizona State University. Attendees circulated papers to one another prior to the meeting. Selim Berker, one of the attendees, circulated his paper “The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience,” which criticizes my work. I was asked to prepare a reply. My reply, for now, consists of the following set of notes. My plan is to turn these notes into a proper manuscript, suitable for publication. 
6 Citations

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 36 REFERENCES
The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience
  • 170
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
Principia Ethica
  • Nature
  • 1922
  • 700
From neural 'is' to moral 'ought': what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology?
  • J. Greene
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Nature Reviews Neuroscience
  • 2003
  • 288
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.
  • 9,650
  • PDF
Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains
  • J. Greene
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • 2007
  • 336
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
2 The Secret Joke of Kant ’ s Soul
  • 6
  • Highly Influential
  • PDF
Who Shalt Not Kill? Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity, Executive Control, and Moral Judgment
  • 305
  • PDF
Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias?
  • 50
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
...