im3shape: a maximum likelihood galaxy shear measurement code for cosmic gravitational lensing

@article{Zuntz2013im3shapeAM,
  title={im3shape: a maximum likelihood galaxy shear measurement code for cosmic gravitational lensing},
  author={J. Zuntz and T. Kacprzak and L. Voigt and M. Hirsch and B. Rowe and S. Bridle},
  journal={Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
  year={2013},
  volume={434},
  pages={1604-1618}
}
  • J. Zuntz, T. Kacprzak, +3 authors S. Bridle
  • Published 2013
  • Physics
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • We present and describe IM3SHAPE, a new publicly available galaxy shape measurement code for weak gravitational lensing shear. IM3SHAPE performs a maximum likelihood fit of a bulgeplus-disc galaxy model to noisy images, incorporating an applied point spread function. We detail challenges faced and choices made in its design and implementation, and then discuss various limitations that affect this and other maximum like lihood methods. We assess the bias arising from fitting an incorrect galaxy… CONTINUE READING
    72 Citations

    Figures and Tables from this paper

    Cosmic shear measurement with maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori inference
    • 3
    • PDF
    Practical Weak Lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
    • 71
    • PDF
    An implementation of Bayesian lensing shear measurement
    • 44
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 60 REFERENCES
    Measurement and calibration of noise bias in weak lensing galaxy shape estimation
    • 73
    • PDF
    Limitations of model-fitting methods for lensing shear estimation
    • 62
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Shapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing
    • 373
    • PDF
    Galaxy shear estimation from stacked images
    • 21
    • PDF
    Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements
    • 106
    • PDF
    A New Shear Estimator for Weak-Lensing Observations
    • 126
    • PDF
    Shear calibration biases in weak-lensing surveys
    • 237
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients
    • 62
    • PDF
    Systematic bias in cosmic shear: extending the Fisher matrix
    • 129
    • PDF