academic heavy-weights: the ‘relevance’ of political science journals

  title={academic heavy-weights: the ‘relevance’ of political science journals},
  author={Thomas Pl{\"u}mper},
  journal={European Political Science},
Journals are currently ‘ranked’ by their influential ‘impact factor’ and their ‘total number of cites’ – both published by Thomson, the company producing and selling the (Social) Science Citation Index. This article suggests an alternative view and ranks political science journals according to the number of articles published within a period of time that have ‘frequently’ been cited. 
Expert-Driven and Citational Approaches to Assessing Journal Publications of Brazilian Political Scientists
In this study, we seek to contribute to discussions on how the quality of academic production in the field of political science should be evaluated using Brazil as a case study. We contrast theExpand
Profile of Contributors to the American Political Science Review, 2010
This study examines the profile of contributors of full-length articles to the American Political Science Review (APSR) in 2010. Of the 79 different contributors, almost 9 (86.1%) out of every 10 areExpand
Reputations and Research Quality in British Political Science: The Importance of Journal and Publisher Rankings in the 2008 RAE
Research Highlights and Abstract The article seeks to make a contribution in the following areas: Departments that submitted a large proportion of books published with a top university press tendedExpand
Publication Bias in Two Political Behavior Literatures
Publication bias occurs when the probability that a paper enters the scholarly literature is a function of the magnitude or significance levels of the coefficient estimates. We investigateExpand
The political economy of politics and international studies impact: REF2014 case analysis
Debates about impact and relevance have long been a feature of British politics and international studies. Thanks to the 2014 Research Excellence Framework, we now have large-scale and comparableExpand
editing the Journal of European Public Policy
The Journal of European Public Policy was launched to fill a perceived intellectual gap in the market for European public policy research. It appears to have been a success but some luck was needed,Expand
What Happens at the Journal Office Stays at the Journal Office: Assessing Journal Transparency and Record-Keeping Practices
Abstract Dissemination of journal submission data is critical for identifying editorial bias, creating an informed scholarly marketplace, and critically mapping the contours of a discipline'sExpand
ABSTRACT This review furthers our understanding of the history of neo-liberalism in Britain, and more particularly of the economics and politics of the 1970s and 1980s, through an examination of theExpand
The Latest Financial Crisis: IR Goes Bankrupt
The latest financial crisis has put the state and the international system to the test. In this context one would expect an explosion in literature from the discipline that claims academic monopolyExpand
Studying the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Europe: A meta-analysis of 89 journal articles
The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is arguably the most ambitious piece of European Union (EU) legislation in the field of water. The directive defines a general framework for integrated river basinExpand


The impact of the nerwork of journals through which acholara disseminate and accredit their ideas is compared to the presrige hierarchy of journals in aoeiology arrd politieat science, A comparisonExpand
Political Scientists' Journal Evaluations Revisited
Refereed journals are a principal means of communication within the scholarly community. Accordingly, publication in refereed journals is taken as a sino quo non for success within the discipline.Expand
An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Political Science Journal Evaluations
In their recent article in PS, Giles, Mizell, and Patterson (1989) provide a long-awaited update of an earlier article (Giles and Wright, 1975) on subjective evaluations by political scientists of aExpand
Evaluating the Evaluators: Accrediting Knowledge and the Ranking of Political Science Journals
The nature of the scientific enterprise requires that we, as professionals in the discipline of political science, do all we can to improve the quality of our collective endeavors. This means that weExpand
Ranking the Graduate Departments in the 1980s: Toward Objective Qualitative Indicators
This essay is based on several technical works, including Steven J. Brams, Superpower Games: Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985) and Brams and MarekExpand
Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data
This article reports and analyzes an updated version of the widely-used Polity II dataset, consisting of annual indicators of institutional democracy and autocracy for 161 states spanning the yearsExpand
British and American Journal Evaluation: Divergence or Convergence? *
regarded by a jury who undoubtedly knew its own mind when it came to pornography (Alexander v. United States, 271 F.2d 140 (8th Cir. 1959)). Similarly, the university political science professor whoExpand
The generalized least squares approach of Parks produces standard errors that lead to extreme overconfidence, often underestimating variability by 50% or more, and a new method is offered that is both easier to implement and produces accurate standard errors. Expand
Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986
Democratic states are in general about as conflict- and war-prone as nondemocracies, but democracies have rarely clashed with one another in violent conflict. We first show that democracy, as well asExpand
Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War
The profound changes now underway in Europe have been widely viewed as harbingers of a new age of peace. With the Cold War over, it is said, the threat of war that has hung over Europe for more thanExpand