You Want Me to Work with Who?: Stakeholder Perceptions of Automated Team Formation in Project-based Courses

@article{Jahanbakhsh2017YouWM,
  title={You Want Me to Work with Who?: Stakeholder Perceptions of Automated Team Formation in Project-based Courses},
  author={Farnaz Jahanbakhsh and Wai-Tat Fu and Karrie Karahalios and Darko Marinov and Brian P. Bailey},
  journal={Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
  year={2017}
}
Instructors are increasingly using algorithmic tools for team formation, yet little is known about how these tools are applied or how students and instructors perceive their use. We studied a representative team formation tool (CATME) in eight project-based courses. An instructor uses the tool to form teams by surveying students' working styles, skills, and demographics; then configuring these criteria as input into an algorithm that assigns teams. We surveyed students (N=277) in the courses to… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

A Learner-Centered Technique for Collectively Configuring Inputs for an Algorithmic Team Formation Tool
The configuration that an instructor enters into an algorithmic team formation tool determines how students are grouped into teams, impacting their learning experiences. One way to decide the
Who Would You Like to Work With?
TLDR
This work describes how users' traits and social networks influence their teammate searches, teammate choices, and team composition on online platforms, and shows that what users initially search for differs from what they finally choose.
Examination of the Effectiveness of a Criteria-based Team Formation Tool
TLDR
CATME, a tool that implements a criteria-based team formation approach, is examined, finding issues related to Self-Assessment such as inconsistencies between students’ ratings of their skills and reporting of their strongest skills.
Structure or Nurture?
TLDR
This work describes an experiment that compares how team composition vs. team-building activities affect student team outcomes and argues that, for instructors deploying a team formation tool, creating an expectation among team members that their team can perform well is as important as tuning the criteria in the tool.
LIFT: Integrating Stakeholder Voices into Algorithmic Team Formation
TLDR
LIFT is proposed, a novel learner-centered workflow where students propose, vote for, and weigh the criteria used as inputs to the team formation algorithm, providing instructors and designers with a workflow and evidence supporting giving learners control of the algorithmic process used for grouping them into teams.
Forming and Assessing Student Teams in Software Engineering Courses
TLDR
Evaluation of a course involving agile software development by 200 students working in 39 teams indicates that teams formed by the students perform slightly better than the teams form by the instructors.
WhoWould You Like to Work With? Use of Individual Characteristics and Social Networks in Team Formation Systems
TLDR
This work describes how users’ traits and social networks influence their teammate searches, teammate choices, and team composition on online platforms, and shows that what users initially search for differs from what they finally choose.
Friends and gurus: do students ask for help from those they know or those who would know
TLDR
This study studied group work in a university level Web software programming course and found that while students knowing each other was the basis of group formation, within those groups students with higher measured knowledge were more likely to be asked for help.
Working with others and enjoying it: CS1 students' experience of small-group collaboration on a business simulation
  • Jyoti Bhardwaj
  • Psychology
    2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)
  • 2020
TLDR
A study exploring whether CS1 entrants’ views of the impact and benefits of group work were modified by the experience of small-group collaboration during their first semester at university finds that participants began and ended the module favourably disposed towards group work.
A Taxonomy of Team-Assembly Systems: Understanding How People Use Technologies to Form Teams
The emergence of team-assembly technologies has brought with it new challenges in designing and implementing socio-technical systems. Our understanding of how systems shape the team-assembly
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 51 REFERENCES
Design and Validation of a Web-Based System for Assigning Members to Teams Using Instructor-Specified Criteria
A significant body of research identifies a large number of team composition characteristics that affect the success of individuals and teams in cooperative learning and project-based team
Evaluating Student Teams: Do Educators Know What Students Think?
TLDR
Evidence is found that students' preferences for evaluation method are influenced by their year of study, familiarity with teammates, and overall happiness with the team experience.
Assigning Students to Groups for Engineering Design Projects: A Comparison of Five Methods
More recently, researchers such as Bruffee, and Johnson and Johnson have explored the positive contributions groups can make to education in much greater detail. Porter asserts that to be its best,
Assigning Students to Groups Using General and Context-Specific Criteria
  • R. Hübscher
  • Education
    IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
  • 2010
TLDR
A method is introduced that allows the instructor to combine a general criterion and a flexible set of context-specific preferences to describe the type of groups preferred and the heuristic Tabu Search algorithm finds solutions satisfying most preferences.
Enriching Our Understanding of Student Team Effectiveness
As team projects become ever more common in business and in the marketing classroom, an increased understanding of factors contributing to team effectiveness is necessary for instructors to assist
Turning Student Groups into Effective Teams
This paper is a guide to the effective design and management of team assignments in a college classroom where little class time is available for instruction on teaming skills. Topics discussed
Lessons from the Best and Worst Student Team Experiences: How a Teacher can make the Difference
This study empirically identifies which teacher-controlled (contextual) variables have the greatest impact on whether the student will have a great team experience or a miserable one. The results
A computer program to aid assignment of student project groups
TLDR
This paper describes a computer program designed to aid assignment to groups while helping to ensure that groups have suitable outside-of-class meeting times.
Groups that work (and those that Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, edited by J. Richard Hackman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1990, 512 pp. Price: $39.95 cloth
Introduction: Work Teams in Organizations: An Orienting Frameword. TOP MANAGEMENT GROUPS: SETTING ORGANIZATIONAL DIRECTIONS. Fairfield Coordinating Group (R. Eisenstat). Corporate Restructuring Team
Assigning Functional Groups: The Influence of Group Size, Academic Record, Practical Experience, and Learning Style
This paper summarizes the results of a four‐year study (September 1992 ‐ December 1995) concerned with the performance of student groups in a senior engineering laboratory course. The investigation
...
1
2
3
4
5
...