Writing Integrative Literature Reviews

  title={Writing Integrative Literature Reviews},
  author={Richard J. Torraco},
  journal={Human Resource Development Review},
  pages={404 - 428}
  • R. Torraco
  • Published 25 October 2016
  • Art, Business
  • Human Resource Development Review
This article presents the integrative review of literature as a distinctive form of research that uses existing literature to create new knowledge. As an expansion and update of a previously published article on this topic, it reviews the growing body of literature on how to write literature reviews. The article identifies the main components of the integrative literature review, provides examples of visual representations for use in literature reviews, and describes how to write literature… 

Tables from this paper

Writing Integrative Reviews of the Literature: Methods and Purposes
  • R. Torraco
  • Art, Business
    Int. J. Adult Vocat. Educ. Technol.
  • 2016
The article concludes that aligning the integrative literature review's methods with its purpose provides unity and coherence to the review.
Overview of the Integrative Review
A reviewer selects literature on a topic and synthesizes and disseminates review findings to a targeted discipline. There are many review methods available for a reviewer to consider. The review
Researching and Conceptualizing an Effective Literature Review
Literature reviews are an integral part of the world of academia. They provide an avenue for the existing body of knowledge to be modified, summarized, outlined, and evaluated for the development of
Creating High‐Impact Literature Reviews: An Argument for ‘Integrative Reviews’
In this article, we argue that integrative literature reviews are among the most useful vehicles for advancing knowledge and furthering research in a topic domain. Integrative literature reviews are
Framework for Conducting and Writing a Synthetic Literature Review
The framework presented in this article supports researchers in translating the copious information gleaned from the research literature into a coherent synthesis and critical analysis of the state
Dissemination of the Integrative Review
The focus of this chapter is on outlining strategies for disseminating the results of integrative reviews through podium presentations, posters, abstracts, and journal articles.
Critical literature reviews: A critique and actionable advice
This article treats critical literature reviews as a distinct review type, and presents a critique of author-labeled critical literature reviews in Organization and Management Studies. We identify
Writing Matrix and Assessing Literature Review: A Methodological Element of a Scientific Project
The present study redefines the literature review substance, synthesis, and procedure to literature matrix, and literature review assessment, and provides matrix for which writing literature review can be easily conducted.
Advancing Theory with Review Articles
Reviewing a body of work presents unique opportunities for making a theoretical contribution. Review articles can make readers think theoretically differently about a given field or phenomenon. Yet,


Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
The integrative literature review is a distinctive form of research that generates new knowledge about the topic reviewed. Little guidance is available on how to write an integrative literature
Conducting a literature review
This article offers support and guidance for students undertaking a literature review as part of their dissertation during an undergraduate or Masters course. A literature review is a summary of a
Constructing a Manuscript: Distinguishing Integrative Literature Reviews and Conceptual and Theory Articles
A reviewer for HRDR once asked the editors, “How do I know whether this is an integrative literature review or a conceptual paper?” When we explored the submissions we were receiving at HRDR, we
Writing Narrative Literature Reviews
Narrative literature reviews can tackle broader and more abstract questions, can engage in more post hoc theorizing without the danger of capitalizing on chance, can make a stronger case for a null-hypothesis conclusion, and can appreciate and use methodological diversity better.
Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles
It is essential that both providers and users appraise the validity of review articles, and checklists can help prevent important errors in this process.
Literature Reviews, Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical Frameworks: Terms, Functions, and Distinctions
This essay starts with a discussion of the literature review, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework as components of a manuscript. This discussion includes similarities and distinctions
Approximating the Practice of Writing the Dissertation Literature Review
This article is an attempt to join the conversation about doctoral preparation that has been a persistent but intermittent topic of interest in educational journals. Previous articles have focused on
Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation
A thorough, sophisticated literature review is the foundation and inspiration for substantial, useful research. The complex nature of education research demands such thorough, sophisticated reviews.
Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews
This paper proposes an alternative to both meta-analytic and traditional reviews that combines the quantification of effect sizes and systematic study selection procedures of quantitative syntheses with the attention to individual studies and methodological and substantive issues typical of the best narrative reviews.