Wound Protectors Reduce Surgical Site Infection: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

@article{Edwards2012WoundPR,
  title={Wound Protectors Reduce Surgical Site Infection: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials},
  author={Janet P. Edwards and Adelyn L. Ho and May C Tee and Elijah Dixon and Chad G. Ball},
  journal={Annals of Surgery},
  year={2012},
  volume={256},
  pages={53–59}
}
Objective: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate whether wound protectors reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after gastrointestinal and biliary tract surgery. Background: The effectiveness of impervious wound edge protectors for reduction of SSI remains unclear. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify RCTs that evaluate the risk of SSI after gastrointestinal and biliary surgeries… 
Wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in lower gastrointestinal surgery: an updated meta-analysis
TLDR
Wound protector use is associated with decreased odds of developing SSI in patients undergoing lower gastrointestinal surgery and there was a subgroup effect when comparing dual-ring to single-ring devices.
Wound Edge Protectors in Open Abdominal Surgery to Reduce Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
TLDR
Wound edge protectors significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infections in open abdominal surgery and further trials are needed to explore their effectiveness in different risk constellations.
Are wound ring protectors effective in reducing surgical site infection post appendectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
TLDR
Some benefit is suggested in using ring retractors to reduce SSI post appendectomy; however the small number and variable quality of the studies suggest the need for more RCTs to confirm these results.
The role of saline irrigation prior to wound closure in the reduction of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
TLDR
This systematic review could not identify an advantage for routine irrigation of abdominal wounds with normal saline over no irrigation prior to wound closure in preventing or reducing the rate of SSI.
A systematic review of clinical effectiveness of wound edge protector devices in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery
TLDR
Wound edge protector devices seems to be an effective intervention to reduce the risk of post-operative SSI in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
The effect of intraoperative wound protector use on the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
TLDR
The results of current study suggests that the use of intraoperative wound protector during pancreatoduodenectomy may reduce the risk of postoperative SSI, and the quality of the available evidence is moderate with high certainty.
Efficacy of a Dual-ring Wound Protector for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Intrabiliary Stents: A Randomized Clinical Trial
TLDR
Among adult patients with intrabiliary stents, the use of a dual-ring wound protector during PD significantly reduces the risk of incisional SSI.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 37 REFERENCES
Barrier Wound Protection Decreases Surgical Site Infection in Open Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
TLDR
The use of barrier wound protection in elective open colorectal resectional surgery resulted in a clinically significant reduction in incisional surgical site infections.
Use of Wound-Protection System and Postoperative Wound-Infection Rates in Open Appendectomy: A Randomized Prospective Trial
TLDR
Use of a wound-protection system reduces the incidence of surgical wound infection in open appendectomy and the decrease in incidence of wound infection observed with the wound- protection system was significant.
Randomized, controlled investigation of the anti-infective properties of the Alexis retractor/protector of incision sites.
TLDR
It was suggested that the use of the Alexis wound retractor would protect surgical wounds from contamination by bacteria and thus prevent infection.
Evaluating an evidence-based bundle for preventing surgical site infection: a randomized trial.
TLDR
An evidence-based intervention bundle did not reduce SSIs and the bundling of interventions, even when the constituent interventions have been individually tested, does not have a predictable effect on outcome.
Plastic wound protectors do not affect wound infection rates following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy
TLDR
The wound protector, although useful for mechanical retraction of small wounds, does not significantly diminish the rate of wound infection at the bowel resection/anastomotic site.
A controlled trial of a plastic wound ring drape to prevent contamination and infection in colorectal surgery
TLDR
It was concluded that the wound ring drape prevents neither contamination nor infection in elective colorectal operations.
A wound protector shields incision sites from bacterial invasion.
TLDR
These results suggest that the WP protects an incision site from bacterial invasion, and may contribute to preventing invasion of the incision margin.
Surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: a review of the nonpharmacologic tools of prevention.
  • Michael Fulmes
  • Medicine
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  • 2011
The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs.
TLDR
In the 1990s, patients who develop SSI have longer and costlier hospitalizations than patients who do not develop such infections, and are twice as likely to die, 60% more likely to spend time in an ICU, and more than five times morelikely to be readmitted to the hospital.
...
1
2
3
4
...