Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma

  title={Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma},
  author={James Connor and Jason Mazanov},
  journal={British Journal of Sports Medicine},
  pages={871 - 872}
Objective: To test Goldman's dilemma on a general population sample by asking whether they would take the Faustian bargain of a drug that guaranteed sporting success but would result in their death in 5 years' time. Between 1982 and 1995 a bi-annual survey using this dilemma suggested half of all elite athletes would take the drug. Design: A random telephone survey of 250 members of the Australian general public, with counterbalanced presentation of success and death. Main outcome measures… 
Would they dope? Revisiting the Goldman dilemma
A subset of athletes are willing to dope and another subset is willing to sacrifice their life to achieve success, although to a much lesser degree than that observed by Goldman.
Dying to win?: the Goldman Dilemma in legend and fact
One of the implicit justifications for antidoping is that athletes are so committed to winning that they will take performance-enhancing substances regardless of the apparent consequences. Athletes
Trading Health Risks for Glory: A Reformulation of the Goldman Dilemma
It is suggested that very few athletes would be expected to accept a PED in the bargain postulated by the Goldman dilemma, and risk tolerance among elite athletes suggest they may be more aware of the potential financial and nonfinancial benefits of such a win, and/or less optimistic about their potential to move up in the level of competition without the use of PEDs.
What would Kim do: a choice study of projected athlete doping considerations.
This paper reports on an empirical discrete choice model of the factors influencing a hypothetical athlete’s deliberations around using prohibited performance enhancing substances (doping) developed
Doping: Which Economic Crime in Sport?
  • W. Andreff
  • Economics
    An Economic Roadmap to the Dark Side of Sport
  • 2019
The definition of doping is a tricky issue on which depends whether it is a prohibited—therefore criminal—activity (as with the WADA negative list) or not. This chapter takes a snapshot view of
Genetic doping: WADA we do about the future of ‘cheating’ in sport?
  • J. Brown
  • Political Science
    The International Sports Law Journal
  • 2019
Due to developments in science and biotechnology, the concept of ‘gene doping’ is emerging as the number one threat to fair play in sport. This procedure, which involves the manipulation of one’s
How to justify a ban on doping?
It is shown that a justification for the doping ban is only possible if its implementation can be safeguarded, and that even if minor health risks are to be expected, a ban on doping can be justified from an ethical point of view.
What do the humanities (really) know about doping? Questions, answers and cross-disciplinary strategies
Abstract Recent years have brought debates about the future role of humanities research in light of sciences’ progress. In doping research, tacit biases in favour of science risk ignoring the
Doping, sport and the law: time for repeal of prohibition?
  • Jack Anderson
  • Sociology
    International Journal of Law in Context
  • 2013
Abstract This article concerns the legal issues that surround the prohibition of doping in sport. The current policy on the use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) in sport is underpinned by both a
Knowledge and Attitude of Hungarian Athletes towards Long-term Sports Injuries
Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate long-term sports injuries, their prevalence, general identification of and consultation about injuries, and the knowledge among Hungarian


Comfort in big numbers: Does over-estimation of doping prevalence in others indicate self-involvement?
The presence of the F CE in estimating doping prevalence or behaviour in others suggests that the FCE based approach may be an avenue for developing an indirect self-report mechanism for PED use behaviour.
Are Elite Athletes Exploited?
Are elite athletes exploited in terms of the health risks they are expected to accept? What are the health risks of elite sport? Are appropriate steps taken to safeguard athletes' health? This essay
Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal
Rather than striving for eradication of doping in sports, which appears to be an unattainable goal, a more pragmatic approach aimed at controlled use and harm reduction may be a viable alternative to cope with doping and doping-like behaviour.
Towards a sociology of drugs in sport
A sociologically informed analysis of drugs in sport requires the researcher to focus upon social forces. It is a continuing flaw of the literature that the individual is prioritized over wider
Using data from a survey of college athletes in an NCAA Division I athletic program, this article shows how interaction with significant others (coaches, teammates, and athletic trainers or physical
Chalked Up: Inside Elite Gymnastics' Merciless Coaching, Overzealous Parents, Eating Disorders, and Elusive Olympic Dreams
Published just as all eyes are on the young female gymnasts competing for a ticket to Beijing on the 2008 Olympic team, "Chalked Up" presents the story of the 1986 US National Gymnastics champion
The anabolic steroids and peptide hormones, A George, and the anabolic steroid side-effects with particular reference to athletes.
Drugs in sport: the pressure to perform
  • C. Jarvis
  • Medicine
    British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • 2004
This book was researched and published before the publication of the IOC study detailing widespread problems with unlisted banned substances in supplements and undoubtedly the authors will mention this in any future edition.
A Social Network Analysys of Influences On Athletes To Play With Pain and Injuries
This paper shows how structural social network analysis can be a potentially powerful way of conceptualizing and explaining athletes' acceptance of the risks of pain and injury in sport. In
The science of doping
The processes used to charge athletes with cheating are often based on flawed statistics and flawed logic, says Donald A. Berry, president of the US Anti-Doping Agency.