• Corpus ID: 74683144

WorldCat Local and the Clinician: Is Discovery Improved?

@inproceedings{Crook2011WorldCatLA,
  title={WorldCat Local and the Clinician: Is Discovery Improved?},
  author={Linda Crook},
  year={2011}
}
  • L. Crook
  • Published 1 November 2011
  • Physics
Crook, Linda. WorldCat Local and the Clinician: Is Discovery Improved? Endnotes: The Journal of the New Members Round Table, v.2 no.1 (November 2011) 
1 Citations
Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research.
TLDR
The discovery of additional relevant material beyond that retrieved from MEDLINE indicates WSD tools' value as a supplement to traditional resources for health sciences researchers.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES
Searching for the right search--reaching the medical literature.
Web-based search engines are transforming our use of the medical literature. Dr. Robert Steinbrook explains that the ongoing changes are part of a broader trend in society.
Literature search on risk factors for sarcoma: PubMed and Google Scholar may be complementary sources
TLDR
Although further studies are warranted, PM and GS appear to be complementary and their integration could greatly improve the search of references in medical research.
Speed, accuracy, and confidence in Google, Ovid, PubMed, and UpToDate: results of a randomised trial
TLDR
Non-Medline based search tools are not inferior to Medlinebased search tools for purposes of answering evidence based anaesthesia and critical care questions, in terms of accuracy, speed, and user confidence.
The challenge of high recall in biomedical systematic search
TLDR
The findings show that although Boolean search has limitations, it is not obvious that ranking is superior, and illustrate that a single query cannot be used to resolve an information need.
Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research.
TLDR
Contradiction and initially stronger effects are not unusual in highly cited research of clinical interventions and their outcomes, but the extent to which high citations may provoke contradictions and vice versa needs more study.
Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches.
TLDR
Comparisons of PubMed and Google Scholar search results for clinical topics in respiratory care to that of a benchmark suggest that PubMed searches with the Clinical Queries filter are more precise than with the Advanced Scholar Search in Google Scholar for respiratory care topics.
Retrieval Comparison of EndNote to Search MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed) versus Searching Them Directly
TLDR
The limitations of EndNote as a search engine for searching MEDLINE were explored as related to MeSH, non-MeSH, citation verification, and author searching.
Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey
TLDR
Systematic reviews can be retrieved from Medline with close to perfect sensitivity or specificity, or with high precision, by using empirical search strategies.
Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar.
  • Mary Shultz
  • Education
    Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
  • 2007
TLDR
This paper compares and contrasts a variety of test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar to gain a better understanding of Google Scholar's searching capabilities.
...
...