World university ranking systems: an alternative approach using partial least squares path modelling

  title={World university ranking systems: an alternative approach using partial least squares path modelling},
  author={Nethal K. Jajo and Jennifer Lynn Harrison},
  journal={Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management},
  pages={471 - 482}
  • N. JajoJ. Harrison
  • Published 3 September 2014
  • Computer Science
  • Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
University rankings are key drivers in national and institutional strategic planning. The increase in the number of university ranking systems and the diversity of methods and indicators used by these systems necessitate the development of an index that can measure a university’s performance in all these systems at once. This article presents the Achievement Index, using real data examples. 

A path for ranking success: what does the expanded indicator-set of international university rankings suggest?

Despite some theoretical and technical criticism, scholars largely acknowledge the influence of universities’ ranking positions on the preferences of fund providers, academics and students,

Is it possible to rank universities using fewer indicators? A study on five international university rankings

Results of the analyses show that the intra-indicators used in ARWU, NTU and URAP are highly similar and that they can be grouped according to their similarities, and that the effect of similar indicators on overall rankings for 2015 is shown.

Comprehensive quantitative analysis of TOP-100s of ARWU, QS and THE World University Rankings for 2014–2018

The article examines the global university reputation race, launched in 2003. Between 2003 and 2010, there appeared a cluster of publications on the qualitative comparative analysis of their

Detecting Convergence Trends among EU Universities

Universities are emerging growth determinants. This is so as, in addition to the fulfillment of their traditional role in teaching and (basic) research, universities, as aptly described within the

Visegrad Group countries compared through world university rankings

The Visegrad Group is an alliance of four Central European countries: Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia, founded by the Visegrad Declaration in 1991. The historical, political, and

Exploring Green Hotel Competitive Strategies by Using the Hybrid Method for Complex Data Analysis

Green hotels emphasize safety, health, and environmental friendliness and advocate for green operations, green consumption, environmental protection, and the reasonable consumption of resources in

Local Explanations of Global Rankings: Insights for Competitive Rankings

This work proposes a hierarchical ranking explanation framework to capture local explanations for competitive rankings by defining a proper neighborhood construction approach and evaluates the generated explanations for the Times Higher Education university ranking dataset as a benchmark of competitive ranking.

Designing a ranking map for the Egyptian universities according to the Egyptian context

Over the past ten years, the focus of Egyptian universities' interest has been the academic ranking among international universities, although there are many scientific elements that need designing

The influence of generic-academic competences on satisfaction and loyalty: the view of two key actors in higher education

ABSTRACT Despite the large number of studies about competences in higher education, several important gaps in research can be identified. The present paper aims to fill two of these gaps by analysing



An analysis of mobility in global rankings: making institutional strategic plans and positioning for building world-class universities

Since the start of the twenty-first century, university rankings have become internationalized. Global rankings have a variety of uses, levels of popularity and rationales and they are here to stay.

Misleading university rankings: cause and cure for discrepancies between nominal and attained weights

Recent research into university ranking methodologies uncovered several methodological problems among the systems currently in vogue. One of these is the discrepancy between the nominal and attained

Learning to Live with League Tables and Ranking: The Experience of Institutional Leaders

This paper draws on the results of an international survey of HE leaders and senior managers, which was supported by the OECD Programme on Institutional Management for Higher Education (IMHE) and the

The Impact of League Tables and Ranking Systems on Higher Education Decision Making

As the battle for “world class excellence” accelerates, competition for students, faculty, finance and researchers between higher education institutions, nationally and internationally, has

Mediating the Use of Global University Rankings

This study explores responses to rankings from a group of staff working as education partnership facilitators for a professional intermediary organisation, the British Council. The study adopts an

International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal

The examination of the existing international ranking systems suggests that generic challenges include adjustment for institutional size, definition of institutions, implications of average measurements of excellence versus measurements of extremes, adjustments for scientific field, time frame of measurement and allocation of credit for excellence.

Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking?

The view is that the Shanghai ranking, in spite of the media coverage it receives, does not qualify as a useful and pertinent tool to discuss the “quality” of academic institutions, let alone to guide the choice of students and family or to promote reforms of higher education systems.

Open Source Knowledge and University Rankings

The fecund growth of open source knowledge goods in the global communicative environment underlines their public good character. Once knowledge goods are disseminated, their cost and price tend

Comparing university rankings

The findings show that there are reasonable similarities between the rankings, even though each applies a different methodology, and overall the similarities are increased when the comparison is limited to the European universities.

Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities

In the Shanghai ranking, the dependence between the score for the SCI indicator and the weighted number of considered articles obeys a power law, instead of the proportional dependence that is suggested by the official methodology of the ranking.