Corpus ID: 107718977

World at Risk: The Report of the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism

@inproceedings{Graham2008WorldAR,
  title={World at Risk: The Report of the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism},
  author={Bob Sen Graham and Jim Talent and Graham Allison Cleveland and Robin and Stephen G. Rademaker and Tim Roemer and Wendy Shewrman and Henry D. Sokolski and Rich Verma},
  year={2008}
}
Abstract : The Commission believes that unless the world community acts decisively and with great urgency, it is more likely than not that a weapon of mass destruction will be used in a terrorist attack somewhere in the world by the end of 2013. The Commission further believes that terrorists are more likely to be able to obtain and use a biological weapon than a nuclear weapon. The Commission believes that the U.S. government needs to move more aggressively to limit the proliferation of… Expand
Nuclear Terrorism: Hype, Risks and Reality-A Case of Pakistan
The danger of nuclear terrorism has heightened significantly in the recent years largely because of the transnational terrorist networks and their unrelenting efforts to acquire nuclear technology.Expand
The bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat: levers & interventions
TLDR
A multi-pronged approach including strong international guidelines and intelligence cooperation and preparatory measures such as the wide-spread use of detection systems as well as diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism detection at the local level are endorsed. Expand
Discarding the Cold War WMD Construct
More than a decade ago, the Bush administration released a National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction that detailed how the U.S. Government would protect the United States, U.S. forces,Expand
Deterrence of nuclear terrorism via post-detonation attribution is the United States on target?
Abstract : As nuclear terrorism has a risk of low probability and high consequences, the United States is right to address it as a significant -- but not the utmost -- national security priority. TheExpand
The Armageddon Scenario: Israel and the Threat of Nuclear Terrorism
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Iranian nuclear threat has obscured the possibility of waging nuclear terrorism against Israel. There is a clear rationale for employing nuclear terrorism and countering itExpand
An Examination of the Potential Threat of a State-Sponsored Biological Attack Against the United States: A Study of Policy Implications
In 2002, US Navy Seals found a list of pathogens in an Afghanistan cave that Al Qaeda had planned to use in a series of biological attacks. Unique about the discovery was that the pathogens were notExpand
Dual-Use Research and Technological Diffusion: Reconsidering the Bioterrorism Threat Spectrum
The global security community continues to view a potential bioterrorist event with concern. Kofi Annan, former Secretary General of the United Nations, stated “the most important under-addressedExpand
Atomic Pile: why the United Nations overstates the threat of nuclear terrorism
The presentation explores the background to nuclear weapons, the range of threats often included under the banner of nuclear terrorism before looking at the reaction of the UN and other sources. ItExpand
Homeland Insecurity Thinking about CBRN Terrorism
As the U.S. government has seen a change of administrations, there is an opportunity for a constructive review of how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has addressed the threat of chemical,Expand
Radicalization of life scientists to terrorism
This project examines common trends in the backgrounds of life scientists that have been radicalized to terrorism. This examination required a review of the general radicalization and recruitmentExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...